Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of Surprise, 800 P.2d 1251.

74 citing documents.

Vangilder v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Vangilder v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, -49 (1990), and Ariz. Downs v. Ariz. Horsemen’s Found., -58 (1981)).
Normandin v. Encanto 425 P.3d 243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Normandin v. Encanto 425 P.3d 243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, ).
State v. Panos 366 P.3d 1006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Panos 366 P.3d 1006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, -49 (1990)).
Steve Gallardo v. State of Arizona 336 P.3d 717 Ariz. 2014
Steve Gallardo v. State of Arizona 336 P.3d 717 Ariz. 2014
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, –49, –57 (1990).
Anderson v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Anderson v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, ).
Gallardo v. State of Arizona 335 P.3d 523 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Gallardo v. State of Arizona 335 P.3d 523 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Fund I v. Town of Surprise
Hawk v. PC Village Ass'n 309 P.3d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Hawk v. PC Village Ass'n 309 P.3d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Fund I v. Town of Surprise
Robert Baker v. University Physicians Healthcare 296 P.3d 42 Ariz. 2013
Robert Baker v. University Physicians Healthcare 296 P.3d 42 Ariz. 2013
Fund I v. Town of Surprise
VERMA v. Stuhr 221 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
VERMA v. Stuhr 221 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Co., 250 So.2d 872 (Fla.1971)), disapproved on other grounds by Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of Surprise, , see also State v. Direct Sellers Ass’n, -170 , -66 (1972) (the prohibition against a state passing a law impairing the obligation of contracts “means only that no state may impair the obligation of an Existing [sic] contract”).
Town of Gilbert v. Maricopa County 141 P.3d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Town of Gilbert v. Maricopa County 141 P.3d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, , (citations omitted).
Speros v. Yu 83 P.3d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Speros v. Yu 83 P.3d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, , (annexation created an island of unincorporated land within the town’s border); Sand-erson Lincoln Mercury, ¶ 23 , (business located on county island within city).
Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of Tucson 59 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of Tucson 59 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, , , (court should not declare entire statute unconstitutional if constitutional and unconstitutional portions can be severed).
Simat Corp. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 56 P.3d 28 Ariz. 2002
Long v. Napolitano 53 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Long v. Napolitano 53 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, , ( , ).
Sherman v. City of Tempe 45 P.3d 336 Ariz. 2002
Sherman v. City of Tempe 45 P.3d 336 Ariz. 2002
Fund I v. Town of Surprise
City of Tucson v. Grezaffi 23 P.3d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
City of Tucson v. Grezaffi 23 P.3d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, -50 , -58 (1990).
In Re Marxus B. 13 P.3d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
In Re Marxus B. 13 P.3d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Fund I v. Town of Surprise
State v. Preston 4 P.3d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Preston 4 P.3d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Fund I v. Town of Surprise
State v. Bonnewell 2 P.3d 682 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Bonnewell 2 P.3d 682 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Fund I v. Town of Surprise
In Re Cesar R. 4 P.3d 980 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
In Re Cesar R. 4 P.3d 980 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT 3 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT 3 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, , (presumption); , (burden).
State Ex Rel. Napolitano v. Brown 982 P.2d 815 Ariz. 1999
State Ex Rel. Napolitano v. Brown 982 P.2d 815 Ariz. 1999
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, , (“An entire statute need not be declared unconstitutional if constitutional portions can be separated.”).
Dickey v. City of Flagstaff 4 P.3d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Dickey v. City of Flagstaff 4 P.3d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, , ( , ).
Martin v. Reinstein 987 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Martin v. Reinstein 987 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
143 , 148, State v. Tocco, 156 Ark.
Pavlik v. Chinle Unified School District No. 24 985 P.2d 633 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Bahr v. State 985 P.2d 564 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Bahr v. State 985 P.2d 564 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
See Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of Surprise