Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of Surprise, 800 P.2d 1251.

74 citing documents.

State v. Lefevre 972 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Lefevre 972 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, , 800 *
U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 972 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 972 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, , Tucson Elec.
Ruiz v. Hull 957 P.2d 984 Ariz. 1998
Ruiz v. Hull 957 P.2d 984 Ariz. 1998
Fund I v. Town of Surprise
City of Tucson v. Woods 959 P.2d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
City of Tucson v. Woods 959 P.2d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Fund I v. Town of Surprise
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of Corrections 934 P.2d 801 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of Corrections 934 P.2d 801 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Fund I v. Town of Surprise
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Purcell 927 P.2d 340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Purcell 927 P.2d 340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Fund I v. Town of Surprise
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Apache County 912 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Apache County 912 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, -49 , -57 (1990).
State Compensation Fund v. Symington 848 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1993
State Compensation Fund v. Symington 848 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1993
we set forth a three-part test to determine whether a law constitutes general or special legislation.
Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. Hassell 837 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. Hassell 837 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
“To be general, a law need not operate on every person, place, or thing within the state____” Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of Surprise
Matter of Cause No. Mh-90-00566 840 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Matter of Cause No. Mh-90-00566 840 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Fund I v. Town of Surprise, , Tocco, 156 Ariz. at 112 , 750 P.2d at 870 , in examining the statute to determine whether it allows the confinement of mentally-ill persons who present no harm to themselves and who are capable of living safely outside the hospital.
El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 851 P.2d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 851 P.2d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of Surprise
Salgado v. Kirschner 836 P.2d 995 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Salgado v. Kirschner 836 P.2d 995 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
See Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of Surprise