Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson, 782 P.2d 727.

93 citing documents.

State Farm Automobile v. Jacey Lee Orlando Ariz. 2025
State Farm Automobile v. Jacey Lee Orlando Ariz. 2025
Staker&parson Companies v. Scottsdale Insurance Co Ariz. 2024
Staker&parson Companies v. Scottsdale Insurance Co Ariz. 2024
Fidelity National v. Osborn III Partners LLC Ariz. 2023
Fidelity National v. Osborn III Partners LLC Ariz. 2023
Gerald Walker v. Auto-Owners Insurance Comp Ariz. 2022
Gerald Walker v. Auto-Owners Insurance Comp Ariz. 2022
and then quoting First Am.
Starr Surplus v. Transwestern Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Starr Surplus v. Transwestern Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Goldberger v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Goldberger v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Allstate v. Maile Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Allstate v. Maile Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Dennis Teufel v. American family/kerry Hanson Ariz. 2018
Teufel v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. 419 P.3d 546 Ariz. 2018
Teufel v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. 419 P.3d 546 Ariz. 2018
v. Wilson , , 258, , 734 (1989), and we interpret it by examining, as pertinent here, the "transaction as a whole," First Am.
Dennis Teufel v. American family/kerry Hanson Ariz. 2018
v. Wilson, and we interpret it by examining, as pertinent here, the “transaction as a whole,” First Am.
Equity Income Partners, LP v. Chicago Title Insurance Co. 387 P.3d 1263 Ariz. 2017
Equity Income Partners, LP v. Chicago Title Insurance Co. 387 P.3d 1263 Ariz. 2017
First American Title Insurance v. Johnson Bank 372 P.3d 292 Ariz. 2016
First American Title Insurance v. Johnson Bank 372 P.3d 292 Ariz. 2016
(stating that ambiguity exists when a policy “presents conflicting reasonable interpretations”); cf. Taylor, 175 Ariz. at 153-54 , 854 P.2d at 1139-40 (discussing ambiguity determinations, parol evidence rule, and court’s “primary objective—to enforce the contract as intended by the par
Nucor Corp. v. Employers Insurance 296 P.3d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Nucor Corp. v. Employers Insurance 296 P.3d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Desert Mountain, 225 Ariz. at 200, ¶ 14 , 236 P.3d at 427 .
American Family Mutual Insurance v. Sharp 277 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2012
American Family Mutual Insurance v. Sharp 277 P.3d 192 Ariz. 2012
Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 273 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 273 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Helvetica Servicing, Inc. v. Pasquan 277 P.3d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Helvetica Servicing, Inc. v. Pasquan 277 P.3d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
) (when a court cannot ascertain the legislature’s intent on a specific issue, it attempts to interpret the statutes in a manner that furthers the perceived goals of the relevant body of legislation).
Bither v. Country Mutual Insurance 245 P.3d 883 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Bither v. Country Mutual Insurance 245 P.3d 883 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 236 P.3d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 236 P.3d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. DGG & Car, Inc. 183 P.3d 513 Ariz. 2008
Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. DGG & Car, Inc. 183 P.3d 513 Ariz. 2008
(stating ambiguity exists when policy “presents conflicting reasonable interpretations”).
Cullen v. Koty-Leavitt Insurance Agency, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Cullen v. Koty-Leavitt Insurance Agency, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Tritschler v. Allstate Insurance Co., Better Way Services Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Tritschler v. Allstate Insurance Co., Better Way Services Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Potter v. U.S. Specialty Insurance Co. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Potter v. U.S. Specialty Insurance Co. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Morgan v. Carillon Investments, Inc. 88 P.3d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Morgan v. Carillon Investments, Inc. 88 P.3d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Liristis v. American Family Mutual Insurance 61 P.3d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Liristis v. American Family Mutual Insurance 61 P.3d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America 9 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2000
Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America 9 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2000
-54 , -30 (1989); Joel DeCiancio, Legislative Review S.B.
Country Mutual Insurance v. Fonk 7 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Country Mutual Insurance v. Fonk 7 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000