Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc., 789 P.2d 1040.

121 citing documents.

Clemens v. Dmb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of Am., Inc.
Hague v. Bill Houston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Hague v. Bill Houston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶35 Even assuming the ambiguous testimony provided was true, see Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of Am., Inc., 17 it goes no further than to state at most that, as Christopher was proceeding down Scottsdale Road, he was involved in a collision with a driver executing a left turn in front of him.
Rees v. Hospital Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rees v. Hospital Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of Am., Inc., (recognizing that plaintiff satisfies burden by presenting facts from which causal relationship may be inferred but cannot leave causation to the jury’s speculation); (noting “causation must be shown to be [p]robable
Doyle v. Bashas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Doyle v. Bashas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“An intervening cause is an independent cause that intervenes between defendant’s original negligent act or omission and the final result and is necessary in bringing about that result.” Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of Am., Inc., (citations omitted).
McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc. 293 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc. 293 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of Am., Inc.
Benkendorf v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 269 P.3d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Benkendorf v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists Chartered 269 P.3d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
See, e.g., Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of Am., Inc., , (recognizing that plaintiff satisfies burden by presenting facts from which causal relationship may be inferred, but cannot leave causation to jury’s speculation); Kreisman v. Thomas, 12 Ariz.App.
Pompeneo v. Verde Valley Guidance Clinic 249 P.3d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Pompeneo v. Verde Valley Guidance Clinic 249 P.3d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of Am., Inc., , (citing Purcell v. Zimbelman, 18 Ariz.App.
Thompson v. Pima County 243 P.3d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Thompson v. Pima County 243 P.3d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of Am., Inc., , 543 n. 2, , 1044 n. 2 (1990).
Salica v. Tucson Heart Hospital - Carondelet, L.L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Braillard v. Maricopa County, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Salica v. Tucson Heart Hospital - Carondelet, L.L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
7 which the injury would not have occurred.”6 Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of Am., Inc.
Braillard v. Maricopa County, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
injuries would not have occurred,” and “[t]he defendant‟s act or omission need not be a „large‟ or „abundant‟ cause of the injury; even if defendant‟s conduct contributes „only a little‟ to plaintiff‟s damages, liability exists if the damages would not have occurred but for that conduct,” Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of Am., Inc.
Ritchie v. Krasner 211 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Ritchie v. Krasner 211 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Steven H. Simon v. Safeway, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Steven H. Simon v. Safeway, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
-44, -45 (1990) (reasonable-care duty of owner or occupier of land includes protecting invitee from criminal attacks if owner knew or should have known of danger).
Gipson v. Kasey 129 P.3d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Gipson v. Kasey 129 P.3d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc., , see also Markiewicz v. Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n, , 338 n. 6, , 526 n. 6 (App.1978) (noting “there is liability if the defendant’s conduct contributed ‘only a little’ to plaintiffs injuries”).
Jeter v. Mayo Clinic Arizona 121 P.3d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Jeter v. Mayo Clinic Arizona 121 P.3d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
See, generally, Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc., , (holding causation cannot be left to speculation).
Barrett v. Harris 86 P.3d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Barrett v. Harris 86 P.3d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc., , Markiewicz v. Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n, , 338 n. 6, , 526 n. 6 (App.1978).
Saucedo Ex Rel. Sinaloa v. Salvation Army 24 P.3d 1274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Saucedo Ex Rel. Sinaloa v. Salvation Army 24 P.3d 1274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
The proximate cause of an injury is defined in Arizona as “that which, in a natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient intervening cause, produces an injury, and without which the injury would not have occurred.” Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of Am., Inc.
Hill v. Safford Unified School District 952 P.2d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Hill v. Safford Unified School District 952 P.2d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Knauss v. DND Neffson Co. 963 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Knauss v. DND Neffson Co. 963 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Dole Food Co. v. North Carolina Foam Industries, Inc. 935 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Dole Food Co. v. North Carolina Foam Industries, Inc. 935 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
However, Dole “need only present probable facts from which a causal relationship reasonably may be inferred.”
Martinez v. Woodmar IV Condominiums Homeowners Ass'n 941 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1997
Distinguished Martinez v. Woodmar IV Condominiums Homeowners Ass'n 941 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1997
(land possessor’s duty encompasses reasonable care to protect from or warn of danger of criminal attacks); Restatement § 344.
Souza v. Fred Carries Contracts, Inc. 955 P.2d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Souza v. Fred Carries Contracts, Inc. 955 P.2d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
See, e.g., Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass’n
McCleaf v. State 945 P.2d 1298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
McCleaf v. State 945 P.2d 1298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.
Sanchez v. City of Tucson 943 P.2d 789 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Sanchez v. City of Tucson 943 P.2d 789 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 933 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix 933 P.2d 1251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Cf. Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc., , (reasonable persons could conclude that, if officer had been warned of recent armed robbery in area, he would have been more careful in approaching the trespasser who shot and killed him).
Tellez v. Saban 933 P.2d 1233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Tellez v. Saban 933 P.2d 1233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of Am., Inc., , Ontiveros, 136 Ariz. at 505-06 , 667 P.2d at 205-06 .
Martinez v. Woodmar IV Condominiums Homeowners Ass'n 930 P.2d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by