Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc., 789 P.2d 1040.
-
Martinez v. Woodmar IV Condominiums Homeowners Ass'n
930 P.2d 485
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of Am., Inc., , , which plaintiff relies on, are inapposite.
- Little v. ALL PHOENIX S. COM. MENT. HLTH. 919 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
-
Little v. ALL PHOENIX S. COM. MENT. HLTH.
919 P.2d 1368
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.
- Little v. All Phoenix South Community Mental Health Center, Inc. 919 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
-
Little v. All Phoenix South Community Mental Health Center, Inc.
919 P.2d 1368
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.
- Smith v. Johnson 899 P.2d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
Smith v. Johnson
899 P.2d 199
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.
- Rudolph v. Arizona B.A.S.S. Federation 898 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
Rudolph v. Arizona B.A.S.S. Federation
898 P.2d 1000
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.
- Haynes v. Syntek Finance Corp. 909 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Haynes v. Syntek Finance Corp. 909 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Maurer v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc. 890 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
-
Maurer v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc.
890 P.2d 69
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
See, e.g., Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc., , (trial court erred in ruhng that motel owner owed no duty to disclose information about eariier presence of robber to independent contractor security guard who was later shot and kiUed by robber.)
- Woodty v. Weston's Lamplighter Motels 830 P.2d 477 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
Woodty v. Weston's Lamplighter Motels
830 P.2d 477
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.
- Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc. 825 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1992
- Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc. 825 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1992
- Rourk v. State 821 P.2d 273 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
-
Rourk v. State
821 P.2d 273
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.
- Estate of Aten v. City of Tucson 817 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
-
Estate of Aten v. City of Tucson
817 P.2d 951
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
“The defendant’s act or omission need not be a ‘large’ or ‘abundant’ cause of the injury; even if defendant’s conduct contributes ‘only a little’ to plaintiff’s damages, liability exists if the damages would not have occurred but for that conduct.”