Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Orme School v. Reeves, 802 P.2d 1000.
- Derosier v. state/ryan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Derosier v. state/ryan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Ganley v. Dependable Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Ganley v. Dependable Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Olariu v. Gibbons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Olariu v. Gibbons
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
P. 56(a); (“Clearly, summary judgment should be granted when the evidence presents no genuine issue of material fact.”) When it ruled on the motions for summary judgment, the trial court found that no genuine issue of material fact existed.
- Stazenski v. Coughlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Stazenski v. Coughlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Phillips v. Garcia 351 P.3d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Phillips v. Garcia
351 P.3d 1105
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
v. Reeves, (accepting special action jurisdiction when the question is a pure issue of law that requires neither factual review nor interpretation).
- Arizona Bank & Trust v. James R. Barrons Trust 351 P.3d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- General Motors Corp. v. Maricopa County 350 P.3d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- General Motors Corp. v. Maricopa County 350 P.3d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Arizona Bank & Trust v. James R. Barrons Trust 351 P.3d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- De Petris v. De Petris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
De Petris v. De Petris
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
v. Reeves, -10, -09 (1990).
- Gallagher v. Tucson Unified School District 349 P.3d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
- Gallagher v. Tucson Unified School District 349 P.3d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
- Diana Glazer v. State of Arizona 347 P.3d 1141 Ariz. 2015
- Diana Glazer v. State of Arizona 347 P.3d 1141 Ariz. 2015
- Garcia v. A-Plus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Garcia v. A-Plus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Lee v. M & H Enterprises, Inc. 347 P.3d 1153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Lee v. M & H Enterprises, Inc. 347 P.3d 1153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Maria J. v. Dcs, R.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Maria J. v. Dcs, R.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Sudberry v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Sudberry v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Russell Piccoli P.L.C. v. O'Donnell 344 P.3d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Russell Piccoli P.L.C. v. O'Donnell 344 P.3d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Carter Inc. v. Jade II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Carter Inc. v. Jade II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Hope v. Renaud Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. Petta 343 P.3d 438 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. Petta 343 P.3d 438 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Hope v. Renaud Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma County Airport Authority 340 P.3d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma County Airport Authority 340 P.3d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- KB Home Tucson, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance 340 P.3d 405 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- KB Home Tucson, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance 340 P.3d 405 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Rees v. Hospital Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Rees v. Hospital
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
v. Reeves, (explaining that summary judgment is proper “if the facts produced in support of the claim .
- Manicom v. Citimortgage, Inc. 336 P.3d 1274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- Manicom v. Citimortgage, Inc. 336 P.3d 1274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- Lim v. Gillies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Lim v. Gillies
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
v. Reeves, (Summary judgment is proper “if the facts produced in support of the claim .
- Fisher v. Edgerton 336 P.3d 167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Fisher v. Edgerton
336 P.3d 167
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
v. Reeves, , (holding federal standards for summary judgment to protect right to a jury trial under Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution apply equally to Arizona constitutional provisions protecting right to jury trial); Dombey, 150 Ariz. at 486 n. 5, 724 P.2d at 572 n. 5 (applying
- Tavilla v. Blue Cross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Tavilla v. Blue Cross
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
v. Reeves, (explaining that summary judgment is proper “if the facts produced in support of the claim .