Cited by

v. Reeves, , (court may not grant summary judgment if doing so would require it to assess “the credibility of witnesses with differing versions of material facts, ...

v. Reeves, 309, 1008 (1990).

v. Reeves, (holding that a party must establish more than a “scintilla of evidence” to preclude summary judgment).

v. Reeves, (holding that if a party with the burden of proof on a defense to summary judgment cannot respond to a summary judgment motion by showing that there is evidence creating a genuine issue of fact then the motion should be granted).

v. Reeves, (explaining that summary judgment is proper “if the facts produced in support of the claim .

v. Reeves, Dyer testified the monies were paid either to his prior law firm or D&B and deferred to Cardillo to provide specific information.

v. Reeves, questions concerning immunity are particularly appropriate for special action review, 1The parties do not dispute that Corum’s conduct constituted a felony; he pled guilty to “attempted secretly viewing or recording another perso

v. Reeves, (To survive summary judgment, the proponent must produce evidence which would allow a reasonable trier of fact to agree with the proponent’s conclusion.).

v. Reeves, , (citing Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 56).