Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Orme School v. Reeves, 802 P.2d 1000.

1307 citing documents.

Ballesteros v. American Standard Insurance 222 P.3d 292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Ballesteros v. American Standard Insurance 222 P.3d 292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District 217 P.3d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District 217 P.3d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Qwest Corp. v. City of Chandler 217 P.3d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Qwest Corp. v. City of Chandler 217 P.3d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
AIDA RENTA TRUST v. Maricopa County 212 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
AIDA RENTA TRUST v. Maricopa County 212 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
HUGHES CUSTOM BLDG, LLC v. Davey 212 P.3d 865 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
HUGHES CUSTOM BLDG, LLC v. Davey 212 P.3d 865 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Beynon v. TREZZA 211 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Beynon v. TREZZA 211 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
South West Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Central Arizona Water Conservation District 212 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
South West Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Central Arizona Water Conservation District 212 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Hudgins v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, CO. 212 P.3d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Hudgins v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, CO. 212 P.3d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Harper v. CANYON LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC 200 P.3d 1032 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Harper v. CANYON LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC 200 P.3d 1032 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
v. Reeves, , (noting that “uniformity in interpretation of our rules and the federal rules is highly desirable”).
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Santa Fe Ridge Homeowners' Ass'n v. Bartschi 199 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Santa Fe Ridge Homeowners' Ass'n v. Bartschi 199 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
v. Reeves, -10 , -09 (1990).
Malad, Inc. v. Miller 199 P.3d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Malad, Inc. v. Miller 199 P.3d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Lee v. State 182 P.3d 1169 Ariz. 2008
Lee v. State 182 P.3d 1169 Ariz. 2008
v. Reeves, -10 , -09 (1990).
Lofts at Fillmore Condominium Ass'n v. Reliance Commercial Construction, Inc. 189 P.3d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Lofts at Fillmore Condominium Ass'n v. Reliance Commercial Construction, Inc. 189 P.3d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
v. Reeves, , , 60, ¶ 17, , 60 (App. 2004).
Warne Investments, Ltd. v. Higgins 195 P.3d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Warne Investments, Ltd. v. Higgins 195 P.3d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
State v. City of Kingman 176 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
State v. City of Kingman 176 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
1800 OCOTILLO, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc. 176 P.3d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
1800 OCOTILLO, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc. 176 P.3d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Catherine E. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Catherine E. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
¶26 Although in deciding whether to grant JMOL a trial court may consider “‘the quantum of evidence required’” by the applicable standard of proof, id., the court should not grant JMOL “simply because [it] believes the moving party should win or will win the jury’s verdict.” Potter v. H. Kern Wisner, M.D., P.C.
National Bank of Arizona v. Thruston 180 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
National Bank of Arizona v. Thruston 180 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Allyn, 167 Ariz. at 195, 805 P.2d at 1016 (moving party bears burden of demonstrating both absence of any factual conflict and right to judgment).
Davis v. Agua Sierra Resources, L.L.C. 174 P.3d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Davis v. Agua Sierra Resources, L.L.C. 174 P.3d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Manu Dube v. Chandra S. Desai and Patricia Desai Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Manu Dube v. Chandra S. Desai and Patricia Desai Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Steven H. Simon v. Safeway, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Steven H. Simon v. Safeway, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
v. Reeves, Safeway suggests Simon is making his argument concerning the nondelegable duty to provide safe premises for the first time on appeal.
Regal Homes, Inc. v. CNA Insurance 171 P.3d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Regal Homes, Inc. v. CNA Insurance 171 P.3d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
v. Reeves, , (stating that affidavits which “tend to contradict the affiant’s sworn testimony at deposition [are] insufficient to withstand a motion for summary judgment.”).
Mobilisa, Inc. v. Doe 170 P.3d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Mobilisa, Inc. v. Doe 170 P.3d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
v. Reeves, -10 , -09 (1990).
First American Title Insurance Co. v. Action Acquisitions, LLC 169 P.3d 127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
First American Title Insurance Co. v. Action Acquisitions, LLC 169 P.3d 127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by