Cited by

(Summary judgment is appropriate “if the facts produced in support of the claim or *189 defense have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent.”).

(weighing of evidence and “‘drawing of legitimate inferences from the facts’” are generally functions for trier of fact), quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S. Ct. 2505, 2513 (1986).

Summary judgment should be granted “if the facts produced in support of the claim or defense have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim or defense.”

v. Reeves, -10, -09 (1990) (alteration in Thompson).

"Like all questions of fact, however, the failure to meet the basic burden of proof with respect to that question will allow the court to rule as a matter of law.” State v. Pelican, 154 Vt. 496 , 580 A.2d 942, 947 (1990); , (summary judgment or directed verdict should be granted “if the facts produced in support of the claim or defense have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of th

v. Reeves, , Ariz. R. Civ.

v. Reeves, -10 , -09 (1990).