Cited by

have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim.”

have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim.”

3 PILLSBURY v. BUTLER Decision of the Court is appropriate “if the facts produced in support of the claim or defense have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim or defense.” Ariz. R. Civ.

v. Reeves, -09 (1990) (finding that when there are no material issues of fact, summary judgment does not offend the Arizona Constitution's guarantee that "the right to jury trial 'shall remain inviolate'") (quoting Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 23); (interpreting statutory language that "

v. Reeves, see Ariz. R. Civ.

v. Reeves, ); accord Ariz. R. Civ.

DISCUSSION ¶9 Summary judgment is appropriate “if the facts produced in support of the claim or defense have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim or defense.”