Cited by

v. Reeves, ("[I]t would effectively abrogate the summary judgment rule to hold that the motion 8 BECK, et al. v. NEVILLE, et al. Morse, J., dissenting should be denied simply on the speculation that .

have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that 2 WARFORD v. 99 CENTS Decision of the Court reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim.”

Summary judgment should be granted only “if the facts produced in support of the claim or defense have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim or defense.”

v. Reeves, (“affidavits .

have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim.”

The superior court should grant summary judgment “if the facts produced in support of the claim or defense have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim or defense.”