Cited by

v. Reeves, (noting also that court should not weigh witness credibility).

that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim or defense.”

(“[B]lind devotion to federal interpretation is not required; we need not follow the federal cases if we believe Arizona policy, practice, or case law requires a different result.”)

Inadmissible evidence “may provide a ‘scintilla’ [of evidence] or create the ‘slightest doubt’ and still be insufficient to withstand a motion for summary judgment.”

v. Reeves, (a motion for summary judgment should not be denied “simply on the speculation that some slight doubt .

v. Reeves, (discussing the purpose of a motion for summary judgment and noting its use when “there is no issue of fact and .