Cited by

v. Reeves, (a party moving for summary judgment needs only to show that no evidence exists to support an essential element of the claim).

v. Reeves, (court should grant summary judgment “if the facts produced in support of the claim or defense have so little probative value, given the quantum of evidence required, that reasonable people could not agree with the conclusion advanced by the proponent of the claim or defense”).

¶22 Our supreme court has recognized that on a motion for summary judgment, a superior court “must evaluate the evidence to some extent.”

(explaining the “mere existence of a scintilla of evidence is insufficient” to withstand a motion of summary judgment, and that “there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for 3 RWI CONSTRUCTION v. SKYZ LLC, et al.

v. Reeves, see also Ariz. R. Civ.

v. Reeves, see also Grafitti-Valenzuela ex rel.

v. Reeves, see also Ariz. Tax Ct. R. Prac.