Cited by

¶22 Our supreme court has recognized that on a motion for summary judgment, a superior court “must evaluate the evidence to some extent.”

(explaining the “mere existence of a scintilla of evidence is insufficient” to withstand a motion of summary judgment, and that “there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for 3 RWI CONSTRUCTION v. SKYZ LLC, et al.

v. Reeves, see also Ariz. R. Civ.

v. Reeves, see also Grafitti-Valenzuela ex rel.

v. Reeves, see also Ariz. Tax Ct. R. Prac.

v. Reeves, (granting summary judgment to the moving party is appropriate when that party shows that "no evidence existed to support an essential element of the claim").