Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial Commission, 796 P.2d 893.

48 citing documents.

Halloum v. Black Diamond Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Halloum v. Black Diamond Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Peterson v. navajo/travelers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Peterson v. navajo/travelers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Trimble v. capital/xl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Trimble v. capital/xl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Turner v. on target/work First Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Turner v. on target/work First Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Comm’n, (internal citation omitted).
Ibarra v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz. 425 P.3d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ibarra v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz. 425 P.3d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Comm'n , , 94, , 896 (1990).
Gradis v. Banner Health Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gradis v. Banner Health Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm'n, -94 (1990) (separate analysis for "arising out of" and "in the course of" elements); Nowlin v. Indus.
Canyon v. Acosta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Canyon v. Acosta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm’n, Arizona Workers’ Compensation Handbook (“Handbook”) § 3.3.4, at 3-14 to -15 (Ray J. Davis, et al., eds., 1992 and Supp. 2015).
Svienty v. Corrpro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Svienty v. Corrpro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
3 SVIENTY v. CORRPRO Decision of the Court Comm’n, Nowlin v. Indus.
Gary D. Hackworth v. Atlas Copco North America and Liberty Mutual Insurance Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Gary D. Hackworth v. Atlas Copco North America and Liberty Mutual Insurance Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Comm’n, -96, -98 (1990); Valerio v. Indus.
Lane v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 178 P.3d 516 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Lane v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 178 P.3d 516 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Comm’n, , whereas with a mixed risk, “personal causes and work combine to produce the harm.” Nowlin, 167 Ariz. at 294 , 806 P.2d at 883 .
Hypl v. Cps, Inc. for Leased Workers Corexpress Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Hypl v. Cps, Inc. for Leased Workers Corexpress Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Furthermore, in Circle K Store No. 1131 v. Industrial Commission, P.2d 893 (1990), the supreme court held that an unexplained injury occurring within the scope of employment 13 is presumptively compensable.
Bergmann Precision, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 15 P.3d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Bergmann Precision, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 15 P.3d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Self v. Industrial Commission 966 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Self v. Industrial Commission 966 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
We construe workers’ compensation statutes liberally and remedially, “with a view of effectuating the principle of placing the burden of death and injury on the industry.” Circle K Store No. 1131 v. Industrial Comm’n
Vargas v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 926 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Vargas v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 926 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
See Circle K Store # 1131 v. Industrial Comm’n, , Ware v. Industrial Comm’n, , McCreary v. Industrial Comm’n
Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. 912 P.2d 1322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. 912 P.2d 1322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
E.g., Circle K Store No. 1131 v. Industrial Comm’n, -94 , -96 (1990); Jayo v. Industrial Comm’n, *101
Jayo v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 889 P.2d 625 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Jayo v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 889 P.2d 625 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
E.g., Circle K Store No. 1131 v. Industrial Comm’n
Poole v. Industrial Commission 850 P.2d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Poole v. Industrial Commission 850 P.2d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
The positional risk doctrine “provides that an injury ‘arises out of’ the *450 employment if it would not have occurred but for the fact the employment placed plaintiff at that location at that particular time.” Circle K Store No. 1131 v. Industrial Comm’n, , (emphasis original); see 1 Larson, supra § 6.50 at 3-6 to 3-7.
Dependable Messenger, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 858 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Dependable Messenger, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 858 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
In its recognition of the positional risk doctrine, Arizona has limited its application to “neutral injuries,” injuries “neither distinctly personal to claimant nor associated with the employment.” See Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial Comm’n, , Estate of Sims, 138 Ariz. at 115 , 673 P.2d at 313 (same).
Montgomery v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 840 P.2d 282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Montgomery v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 840 P.2d 282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Claimant argues in the alternative that the Treadway commonalty rule has been “obliterated” by the Arizona Supreme Court’s adoption of the positional risk doctrine in Circle K Store # 1131 v. Industrial Comm’n
Arizona Dept. of Public Safety v. Industrial Commission 823 P.2d 1283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Arizona Dept. of Public Safety v. Industrial Commission 823 P.2d 1283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See, e.g., Circle K Store #1131 v. Industrial Comm’n
McCreary v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 835 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
McCreary v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 835 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See Circle K Store #1131 v. Industrial Comm’n, , 94 n. 2, , 896 n. 2 (1990); Samaritan Health Servs.
Lou Grubb Chevrolet v. INDUS. COM'N 829 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Criticized Lou Grubb Chevrolet v. INDUS. COM'N 829 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
But cf. Circle K Store #1131 v. Industrial Comm’n, , 94 n. 2, (criticizing Industrial Indemnity for requiring increased risk).
Samaritan Health Services v. Industrial Commission 823 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Samaritan Health Services v. Industrial Commission 823 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Circle K Store No. 1131 v. Industrial Comm’n, -94 , -96 (1990) (citing Murphy v. Industrial Comm’n, , ).
Nowlin v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 806 P.2d 880 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Nowlin v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 806 P.2d 880 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Circle K Store #1131 v. Industrial Comm’n