Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Wyatt v. Wehmueller, 806 P.2d 870.

221 citing documents.

State v. Foy 859 P.2d 789 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Foy 859 P.2d 789 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Lowing v. Allstate Insurance 859 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1993
Lowing v. Allstate Insurance 859 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1993
“The primary principle of statutory interpretation is to determine and give effect to legislative intent.”
Mail Boxes, U.S.A. v. Industrial Commission 871 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Rivera 836 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Rivera 836 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
“The primary principle of statutory interpretation is to determine and give effect to legislative intent.”
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Hohn 832 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1992
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Hohn 832 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1992
Blum v. STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS 829 P.2d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Blum v. STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS 829 P.2d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hampton v. Glendale Union High School District 837 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hampton v. Glendale Union High School District 837 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Kaku v. Arizona Board of Regents 836 P.2d 1006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Kaku v. Arizona Board of Regents 836 P.2d 1006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Devenir Associates v. City of Phoenix 821 P.2d 161 Ariz. 1991
Devenir Associates v. City of Phoenix 821 P.2d 161 Ariz. 1991
DeJonghe v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc. 830 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Hatch Companies Contracting, Inc. v. Arizona Bank 826 P.2d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
DeJonghe v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc. 830 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
While admitting that actual damages can be recovered without a showing of scienter, defendants claim treble damages cannot because they are “punitive in nature.”
Hatch Companies Contracting, Inc. v. Arizona Bank 826 P.2d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Recently, , held that damages may not be assessed against a client pursuant to A.R.S.