Cited by

Co., (“[T]his court construes statutes to avoid rendering them unconstitutional.”).

Co., (declining to find a preemptive intent in the absence of explicit language required for preemption given that “the legislature is well aware of the words of art that should be used to accomplish such a result”).

Co., see also S. AZ Home Builders Assoc.

Co., (noting it is "unwise" to speculate about legislative intent if an issue may be decided on other grounds).

Co., (court construes statutes to avoid rendering them unconstitutional).

Co., see also In re Coconino Cnty.

Co., (We favor a construction that allows us “to avoid unnecessary resolution of constitutional issues.”).

Co., –70 (1994) (“When seeking to ascertain the intent of legislators, courts normally give little or no weight to comments made at committee hearings by nonlegislators.”); (“[A] single member of the legislature is not able to testify regarding the intent of the l

Realty of Az., and Hayes v. Cont’l Ins., ).