Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hayes v. Continental Insurance, 872 P.2d 668.

433 citing documents.

State ex rel. Thomas v. Talamante 149 P.3d 484 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Co., , , (“Legislative intent often can be discovered by examining the development of a particular statute.”).
Ulan v. Pima County Board of Supervisors 145 P.3d 650 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Ulan v. Pima County Board of Supervisors 145 P.3d 650 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Gordon 144 P.3d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Gordon 144 P.3d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Co., , (citing cases); Vega, 199 Ariz. at 507, ¶ 8 , 19 P.3d at 648 .
Scott Douglas Nordstrom v. State of Arizona 142 P.3d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Scott Douglas Nordstrom v. State of Arizona 142 P.3d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
David Garcia v. State of Arizona 146 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
David Garcia v. State of Arizona 146 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Co., n.5, n.5 (1994); State ex rel.
Callan, Miranda, Azuelo... v. Pimber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Callan, Miranda, Azuelo... v. Pimber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State v. Gomez 127 P.3d 873 Ariz. 2006
State v. Gomez 127 P.3d 873 Ariz. 2006
State v. Gaynor-Fonte 123 P.3d 1153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Gaynor-Fonte 123 P.3d 1153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court 120 P.3d 1092 Ariz. 2005
Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court 120 P.3d 1092 Ariz. 2005
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 105 P.3d 1163 Ariz. 2005
Marriage of Cook v. Cook 104 P.3d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Marriage of Cook v. Cook 104 P.3d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Co., , (“[I]f possible this court construes statutes to avoid rendering them unconstitutional.”) (citations omitted).
State v. Miguel 101 P.3d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Miguel 101 P.3d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Arizona State Democratic Party v. State 98 P.3d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Arizona State Democratic Party v. State 98 P.3d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Fell 97 P.3d 902 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Fell 97 P.3d 902 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Co., , (when text of statute is clear and unambiguous, courts need not employ other methods of statutory interpretation to determine legisla *87 tive intent because that intent can be determined from face of statute).
MacKey, Schuessler, Bayly v. Mayor and Council of the City of Tucson 96 P.3d 231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
MacKey, Schuessler, Bayly v. Mayor and Council of the City of Tucson 96 P.3d 231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Carl Seel v. Tim Sifert Ariz. 2004
Carl Seel v. Tim Sifert Ariz. 2004
North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. Santana 93 P.3d 501 Ariz. 2004
North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. Santana 93 P.3d 501 Ariz. 2004
Riepe v. Riepe 91 P.3d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Amparano v. Asarco, Inc. 93 P.3d 1086 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Amparano v. Asarco, Inc. 93 P.3d 1086 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Because Arizona’s superior courts are courts of general jurisdiction, , the Ampáranos argue that Rule 12(b)(3), Ariz. R. Civ.
J.L.F. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 91 P.3d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
J.L.F. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 91 P.3d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Bilke v. State 80 P.3d 269 Ariz. 2003
Bilke v. State 80 P.3d 269 Ariz. 2003
Co., 178 Ariz. 264, 268, unless application of the plain meaning would lead to impossible or absurd results.
Douglas v. Governing Board of the Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8 78 P.3d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Douglas v. Governing Board of the Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8 78 P.3d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Co., , and we find no such guarantees.
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 78 P.3d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 78 P.3d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
TANQUE VERDE UNIFIED SCHOOL v. Bernini 76 P.3d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
TANQUE VERDE UNIFIED SCHOOL v. Bernini 76 P.3d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State v. Christian 66 P.3d 1241 Ariz. 2003
State v. Christian 66 P.3d 1241 Ariz. 2003
Country Mutual Insurance v. Hartley 65 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by