Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Lowing v. Allstate Insurance, 859 P.2d 724.

96 citing documents.

Wenc v. SIERRA VISTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. 108 P.3d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Wenc v. SIERRA VISTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. 108 P.3d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Pima County v. Pima County Law Enforcement Merit System Council 99 P.3d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Pima County v. Pima County Law Enforcement Merit System Council 99 P.3d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Co., , (“ ‘The primary principle of statutory interpretation is to determine and give effect to legislative intent.’ ”)
Pierce v. Molet 87 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Washburn v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Washburn v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Pleak v. Entrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Pleak v. Entrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Galati v. America West Airlines, Inc. 69 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Galati v. America West Airlines, Inc. 69 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Hickman 68 P.3d 418 Ariz. 2003
State v. Hickman 68 P.3d 418 Ariz. 2003
Scruggs v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 62 P.3d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Scruggs v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 62 P.3d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
However, , the supreme court overruled Balestrieri and interpreted the Act to require that uninsured motorist coverage protect the insured from “miss and run” drivers whether or not physical contact had occurred.
Haralson v. Fisher Surveying, Inc. 31 P.3d 114 Ariz. 2001
Haralson v. Fisher Surveying, Inc. 31 P.3d 114 Ariz. 2001
West Maricopa Combine, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Water Resources 26 P.3d 1171 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Sherman v. City of Tempe 24 P.3d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Sherman v. City of Tempe 24 P.3d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Co., -04 , -27 (1993) (citations omitted) ( , ).
West Maricopa Combine, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Water Resources 26 P.3d 1171 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Co., , (best way to give effect to the legislative intent is to follow the clear and unequivocal language of the statute)).
Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America 9 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2000
Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of America 9 P.3d 1049 Ariz. 2000
State v. Petrak 8 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Petrak 8 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Drucker v. Greater Phoenix Transportation Co. 3 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Drucker v. Greater Phoenix Transportation Co. 3 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Co., , (recognizing that UM/UIM statute “is remedial in nature and should be liberally construed”); Employers Mut.
Southwestern Paint & Varnish Co. v. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 976 P.2d 872 Ariz. 1999
Southwestern Paint & Varnish Co. v. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 976 P.2d 872 Ariz. 1999
Co., 176 Ariz. *26 101, 106
Paging Network of Arizona, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 970 P.2d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Paging Network of Arizona, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 970 P.2d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Arizona Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Honeywell, Inc. 945 P.2d 805 Ariz. 1997
Arizona Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Honeywell, Inc. 945 P.2d 805 Ariz. 1997
Carden v. Golden Eagle Insurance 947 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Carden v. Golden Eagle Insurance 947 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Tallent v. National General Insurance 903 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Tallent v. National General Insurance 903 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Transportation Insurance v. Martinez 899 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Transportation Insurance v. Martinez 899 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Co., Inc., , held that an unidentified motorist who caused an accident fell within the meaning of A.R.S.
Mancillas v. PROPERTY & CAS. INS. FUND 897 P.2d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Mancillas v. PROPERTY & CAS. INS. FUND 897 P.2d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Mancillas v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 897 P.2d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Mancillas v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 897 P.2d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Jett v. City of Tucson 882 P.2d 426 Ariz. 1994
Jett v. City of Tucson 882 P.2d 426 Ariz. 1994
Roosevelt Elementary School District Number 66 v. Bishop 877 P.2d 806 Ariz. 1994