Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co., 869 P.2d 500.

198 citing documents.

Blankenbaker v. Jonovich 71 P.3d 910 Ariz. 2003
Sanderson Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. 68 P.3d 428 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Sanderson Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. 68 P.3d 428 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Co., Inc., , , (If the statutory language is unambiguous, we give effect to the language and do not use other rules of statutory construction in interpretation.); A.R.S.
Hullett v. Cousin 63 P.3d 1029 Ariz. 2003
Hullett v. Cousin 63 P.3d 1029 Ariz. 2003
Scruggs v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 62 P.3d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Scruggs v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 62 P.3d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Viramontes 64 P.3d 188 Ariz. 2003
State v. Viramontes 64 P.3d 188 Ariz. 2003
Simat Corp. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 56 P.3d 28 Ariz. 2002
Schritter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 36 P.3d 739 Ariz. 2001
Schritter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 36 P.3d 739 Ariz. 2001
State v. Estrada 34 P.3d 356 Ariz. 2001
State v. Estrada 34 P.3d 356 Ariz. 2001
Steiger v. Woods 32 P.3d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Steiger v. Woods 32 P.3d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
State v. Skiba 19 P.3d 1255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Followed State v. Skiba 19 P.3d 1255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
State v. Derello 18 P.3d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
State v. Derello 18 P.3d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
In re Richard G. 995 P.2d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In re Richard G. 995 P.2d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co. 977 P.2d 769 Ariz. 1999
Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co. 977 P.2d 769 Ariz. 1999
Construction Co., , and Broemmer v. Abortion Services, Ltd.
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Bach 973 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1999
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Bach 973 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1999
Open Primary Elections Now v. Bayless 969 P.2d 649 Ariz. 1998
Open Primary Elections Now v. Bayless 969 P.2d 649 Ariz. 1998
Stewart v. Travers 965 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Stewart v. Travers 965 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Construction Co., Inc., , ).
Bustos v. W.M. Grace Development 966 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Bustos v. W.M. Grace Development 966 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
State v. Getz 944 P.2d 503 Ariz. 1997
State v. Getz 944 P.2d 503 Ariz. 1997
Co., , (“[W]here the language is plain and unambiguous, courts generally must follow the text as written.”).
R.L. Augustine Construction Co. v. Peoria Unified School District No. 11 936 P.2d 554 Ariz. 1997
R.L. Augustine Construction Co. v. Peoria Unified School District No. 11 936 P.2d 554 Ariz. 1997
Zamora v. Reinstein 915 P.2d 1227 Ariz. 1996
Zamora v. Reinstein 915 P.2d 1227 Ariz. 1996
State v. Tarango 914 P.2d 1300 Ariz. 1996
State v. Tarango 914 P.2d 1300 Ariz. 1996
Const. Co., , (“[W]here the language is plain and unambiguous, courts generally must follow the text as written.”); Mid Kansas Fed.
Mohave Disposal, Inc. v. City of Kingman 909 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Mohave Disposal, Inc. v. City of Kingman 909 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Business Realty of Arizona, Inc. v. Maricopa County 892 P.2d 1340 Ariz. 1995
Business Realty of Arizona, Inc. v. Maricopa County 892 P.2d 1340 Ariz. 1995
Canon Sch. Dist. v. WES CONSTR. CO. IV 882 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1994
Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co. 882 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1994
Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co. 882 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1994
Canon Sch. Dist. v. WES CONSTR. CO. IV 882 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1994