Cited by

Co. (“Canon”), our supreme court decided whether “section” means “subsection.” There, a construction company claimed a school district breached a contract.

Co., (internal quotation marks omitted))).

Const. Co. Inc., (“[W]e are reluctant to construe the words of a statute to mean something other than what they plainly state.”).

Const. Co., (noting "we are reluctant to construe the words of a statute to mean something other than what they plainly state").

Co., (citation omitted).

Co., (statutory interpretation); ¶ 7 (2012) (motion to dismiss).

Co., and it is without power to enact a regulation that conflicts with a statute, –95, ¶¶ 18–19 (App. 2009) (determining whether an administrative rule and agency policy “unlawfully restrict[ed] the statutory grant of coverage”); see also Fre

Co. , , 529, , 503 (1994).

Const. Co., (explaining that, “absent a clear indication of legislative intent,” a court generally may not read words into a statute).

Co., Inc., , (citing Bd.