Cited by

errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”

(“[B]y failing to [request findings when the court failed to make them], a litigant is not in the position to complain about how helpful findings would have been on appeal.”) b. Rule 55(b)(3) ¶24 Rule 55(b)(3) requires that “[a] judgment by default must not be different in kin

¶ 14 (App. 2008); -01 (1994) (“Although findings of fact and conclusions of law are certainly helpful on appellate review, they do not go to the foundation of the case or deprive a party of a fair hearing.”).

(“arguments not made at the trial court cannot be asserted on appeal”); (specific objection is required in trial court to give court opportunity to “correct any asserted defects” before appellant claims error on review).

(“[A]bsent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal” because “a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects[.]”).

Myrick, 235 Ariz. at 494-95, ¶ 10 ( ¶ 39 (App. 2011)).

(“Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”).

(“Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”)

(“Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”)

¶10 Furthermore, "absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the superior court cannot be raised on appeal" because the "court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects[.]" (citations omitted).

(“Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal ...

(“[A]bsent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”).

We address his arguments as best we can discern them, but consider waived arguments not supported by adequate explanation, citations to the record, or authority, –65, ¶ 6 (2013), and those raised for the first time on appeal, see Amparano v. ASARCO, Inc., ¶ 13 (App. 2004)

In any event, we generally will not consider an argument raised for the first time in a motion for a new trial, , or on appeal, , because the trial court and opposing counsel were not afforded an opportunity to address them below.

We address the Ekweanis’ arguments as best we can discern them, but we consider waived both arguments not supported by adequate explanation, citations to the record, or authority, –65, ¶ 6 (2013), and those raised for the first time on appeal, see Amparano v. ASARCO, Inc., ¶ 13 (App. 2004)

“Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.” (citation omitted).

See Airfreight Express Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Ctr., Inc., ¶ 26 (App. 2007) (objections to declarations untimely when made after court ruled on motion for summary judgment); (“Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”).

(holding that absent extraordinary circumstances, we will not address issues raised for the first time on appeal).1 ¶13 Waiver aside, Wife has not established that the trial court abused its discretion in calculating the amount of the equitable lien.

¶14 Furthermore, “absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal” because “a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects[.]” –01 (1994).