Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Trantor v. Fredrikson, 878 P.2d 657.
-
Cimarron Foothills Community Ass'n v. Kippen
79 P.3d 1214
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
(“Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”); see also Navajo Nation v. MacDo
- Johnson v. Mohave County 78 P.3d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
- Johnson v. Mohave County 78 P.3d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
- John L Powers v. John M Carpenter Ariz. 2002
- John L Powers v. John M Carpenter Ariz. 2002
- Banales v. Smith 26 P.3d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
-
Banales v. Smith
26 P.3d 1190
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
¶ 6 -01 , -59 (1994), our supreme court held that a party must have afforded the trial court and opposing counsel the opportunity to correct any asserted defects in order to contest on appeal the absence of a trial court’s necessary findings of fact and conclusions of law.
- In Re Marriage of Pownall 5 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- In Re Marriage of Pownall 5 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- Conant v. Whitney 947 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-
Conant v. Whitney
947 P.2d 864
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
(“Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”) (citations omitted); see also Ruck
- State v. Torres-Soto 927 P.2d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
State v. Torres-Soto
927 P.2d 804
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
(“[Ajbsent extraordinary circumstances, errors [relating to imposition of attorneys’ fees] not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”).