Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Trantor v. Fredrikson, 878 P.2d 657.
- Johnson v. Cameron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Fuqua v. Dollar Tree Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Johnson v. Cameron
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“[A] party is entitled to findings and conclusions to aid in appellate review”).
-
Fuqua v. Dollar Tree
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 120, (“[I]f evidence is objected to on one ground in the trial court and admitted over that objection, other grounds raised for the first time on appeal are waived.”); (“absent 7 Dr. Stephen Brown, who performed an independent medical examination at Dollar Tree’s request, testified that Fuqua had a “very nice recovery” from the hip fracture, which healed “without consequence,” and stated that her ongoing problems were attributable to pre-existing
- In Re Mh2013-001793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
In Re Mh2013-001793
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“[E]rrors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”).
- Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 319 P.3d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
319 P.3d 236
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 21, (concluding that parent waived claim that juvenile court failed to make statutorily required findings by failing 4 SHAWANEE S. v. ADES, et al. Opinion of the Court to object in the juvenile court); (“[A]bsent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal” because “a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects[.]”).
- Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. Noder 314 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
-
Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. Noder
314 P.3d 89
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
(“Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”) VI.
- Nold v. Nold 304 P.3d 1093 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
-
Nold v. Nold
304 P.3d 1093
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
(holding that “absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal”).
- Johnson v. Gravino 293 P.3d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
- Johnson v. Gravino 293 P.3d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
- Wang Electric, Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, LLC 283 P.3d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Wang Electric, Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, LLC
283 P.3d 45
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
("Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”).
- Kimicata v. McGee 279 P.3d 631 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Kimicata v. McGee
279 P.3d 631
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
(citations omitted) (“[B]ecause a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”); see also In
- Dessarollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo v. Kader Holdings Company Limited Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
-
Dessarollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo v. Kader Holdings Company Limited
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
(“Because a trial court .
- In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029 240 P.3d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
- In Re Mh2009-002120 237 P.3d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
In Re Mh2009-002120
237 P.3d 637
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
("Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal."); see also In re MH XXXX-XXXXXX, 221 A
- Old Republic National Title Insurance v. New Falls Corp. 233 P.3d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
Old Republic National Title Insurance v. New Falls Corp.
233 P.3d 639
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
("Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”).
- Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
-
Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Co., (requirement of findings same for §§ 12-341.01(C), 12-349).
- In Re Mh 2008-002659 226 P.3d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- In Re Mh 2008-002659 226 P.3d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Lips v. Scottsdale Healthcare Corp. 214 P.3d 434 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-
Lips v. Scottsdale Healthcare Corp.
214 P.3d 434
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
(“Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct *353 any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”).
- Reid v. Reid 213 P.3d 353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-
Reid v. Reid
213 P.3d 353
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
at ¶¶ 3^1 ¶ 15 This court noted that the father had failed to raise this omission in his motion for new trial or in any other objection or motion filed before the trial court, and, -01 , -59 (1994), we held that the father had waived the issue on appeal.
- State v. Moreno-Medrano 185 P.3d 135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
-
State v. Moreno-Medrano
185 P.3d 135
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
at 145 , 927 P.2d at 805 , , (errors in imposing attorney fees not raised at trial waived on appeal).
- Flores v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co. 178 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
-
Flores v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co.
178 P.3d 1176
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
-01 , -59 (1994) (declining to consider issues not presented to the trial court).
- Catherine E. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
-
Catherine E. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLC
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
(“[E]rrors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.”).
- In Re the Commitment of Jaramillo 176 P.3d 28 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
-
In Re the Commitment of Jaramillo
176 P.3d 28
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
-01 , -59 (1994) (trial court’s failure to make findings of fact and conclusions of law waived for failure to raise issue in trial court even where case law required such findings).
- In Re the Estate of ELLIOT GOLDMAN 158 P.3d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
-
In Re the Estate of ELLIOT GOLDMAN
158 P.3d 892
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
See Trantor v. Fredrikson, 179 Ariz. 299, 300, (“Because a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, .
- In re MH 2006-000023 150 P.3d 1267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
-
In re MH 2006-000023
150 P.3d 1267
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
As the Arizona Supreme Court has written, “[bjecause a trial court and opposing counsel should be afforded the opportunity to correct any asserted defects before error may be raised on appeal, absent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.” , (citations omitted).
- Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc. 128 P.3d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
-
Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc.
128 P.3d 234
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
(”[A]bsent extraordinary circumstances, errors not raised in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal."); DeElena v. S. Pac.
- Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING 120 P.3d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
- Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING 120 P.3d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
- Cimarron Foothills Community Ass'n v. Kippen 79 P.3d 1214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003