Cited by

¶ 34 (1998); Wells Fargo Bank v. Ariz. Laborers, Teamsters and Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Tr.

The statute begins to run when “the plaintiff knows or with reasonable diligence should know the facts underlying the cause.”

See, Mobilisa, ¶ 1 n.1 (App. 2007) (“The trial court allowed plaintiff Jane Doe to proceed pseudonymously.

A. Discovery Rule ¶13 Under the discovery rule, a claim “does not accrue until the plaintiff knows or with reasonable diligence should know the facts underlying the cause.” ¶ 29 (1998) (citation omitted) (emphasis added).

¶ 32 (1998); Tovrea Land &

Under the discovery rule, a cause of action accrues when a “plaintiff knows or with reasonable diligence should know the facts underlying the cause.” ¶ 29 (1998).

When determining whether to apply a statute of limitations against a civil plaintiff of unsound mind, courts look at two scenarios: “(1) inability to manage daily affairs, and (2) inability to understand legal rights and liabilities.” ¶ 42 (1998).

Under § 12–821, “[a] plaintiff need not know all the facts underlying a cause of action to trigger accrual.” ¶ 12 (App. 2010) ( ¶ 32 (1998)).

But the plaintiff must at least possess a minimum requisite of knowledge sufficient to identify that a wrong occurred and caused injury.” ().

¶ 45 (1998) (recognizing that weighing conflicting evidence is the jury’s function).

¶13 The discovery rule provides that a statute of limitations is tolled until “the plaintiff knows or with reasonable diligence should know the facts underlying the cause.” ¶ 29 (1998).

6 CAVNESS v. CAVNESS-ENGSTRAND Decision of the Court to bar an action in which the plaintiff is mentally disabled and thus unable to appreciate or pursue his or her legal rights.” ¶ 41 (1998) (Emphasis omitted).

(tolling for a claimant’s unsound mind).

We review the superior court’s statute of limitations rulings de novo as questions of law, mindful, however, that the date a cause of action accrues is “usually and necessarily [a] question[] of fact for the jury.” ¶ 32 (1998); ¶ 14 (App. 2014); see also Goodman v. Physical Res.

ption petitions and “circumvent[ion of] the Clerk of Court and Juvenile Adoptions Unit Processing to achieve an adoption less than one day after filing the Petition to Adopt.” The contents of the motion indicated that on the day it was filed Appellants were aware of their injury by Johnson and Fernstrom, even if Appellants did not “know all the facts underlying [the] cause of action.” ¶ 32 (1998).

¶16 For a cause of action to accrue, a plaintiff must possess “a minimum requisite knowledge sufficient to identify that a wrong occurred and caused injury,” but “need not know all the facts underlying a cause of action to trigger accrual.” ¶ 8 (App. 2017) ( ¶ 32 (1998)).

¶ 32 (1998); ¶ 14 (App. 2010).

Under the discovery rule, a cause of action accrues when the plaintiff knows she has been injured and has a “reason to connect [the injury] to a particular [cause, source, act, event, instrumentality or condition] in such a way that a reasonable person would be on notice to investigate whether the injury might result from fault.” ¶ 22 (2002); ¶ 29 (1998) (“A cause of action [accrues when] the plaintiff knows or with reasonable diligence should know the facts underlying the cause.”) (emphasis add

¶15 To survive summary judgment, the non-movant “bears the burden of producing sufficient evidence that an issue of fact does exist.” ¶ 33 (1998).

Because a party is not allowed to “sleep on [their] rights” regarding an unknown claim, ¶ 29 (1998), the discovery rule provides that “a cause of action does not ‘accrue’ until a plaintiff discovers or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered that he or she has been injured by the defendant’s negligent conduct,” Anson v. Am.

Once this showing is made, the non-movant “bears the burden of producing sufficient evidence that an issue of fact does exist.” ¶ 33 (1998).

that rule, a cause of action accrues when the plaintiff knows he or she has been injured and has a “reason to connect [the injury] to a particular [cause, source, act, event, instrumentality, or condition] in such a way that a reasonable person would be on notice to investigate whether the injury might result from fault.” ¶ 22 (2002) (emphasis added); ¶ 29 (1998) (“A cause of action [accrues when] the plaintiff knows or with reasonable diligence should know the facts underlying the cause.”) (emp