Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Bach, 973 P.2d 106.

40 citing documents.

Martinez v. Blake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Martinez v. Blake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
McGee v. Syms Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
McGee v. Syms Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass’n, – 03, ¶¶ 7–8 (1999).
Barron v. Barron 443 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Barron v. Barron 443 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 9 (1999) ("[L]egal assistant and law clerk services may properly be included as elements in attorneys' fees applications and awards because these individuals typically have acquired legal training and knowledge sufficient to permit them to contribute substantively to an attorney's analysis and preparation of a
Black Creek v. Alanco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Black Creek v. Alanco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 15 (1999) (upholding award of non-taxable costs because of the parties' "broadly written contract provision").
Rodriguez v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Rodriguez v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ass’n v. Bach, ¶ 6 (1999).
Orosco v. McShcd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Orosco v. McShcd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Because the Oroscos could only recover costs pursuant to statutory authorization, ¶ 6 (1999), on remand, the superior court should vacate the portion of the cost award relating to meals, experts' travel time and experts' travel expenses.
Hall v. Elected Officials' Retirement Plan 383 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2016
Hall v. Elected Officials' Retirement Plan 383 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2016
Thienes v. City Center Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Thienes v. City Center Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ass’n v. Bach, -04, ¶¶ 6-12, -09 (1999) (“Allowing a party to recover non-taxable costs under the guise of attorneys’ fees would undermine the legislative intent expressed in A.R.S.
RS Industries, Inc. v. Candrian 377 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
RS Industries, Inc. v. Candrian 377 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Keg Restaurants Arizona, Inc. v. Jones 375 P.3d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Keg Restaurants Arizona, Inc. v. Jones 375 P.3d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ass’n v. Bach, , 404 ¶ 14
Lockerby v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lockerby v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Newman v. Select Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Newman v. Select Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
MOTZER Dba RLM DESIGNS v. ESCALANTE Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
MOTZER Dba RLM DESIGNS v. ESCALANTE Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Dos Picos Land Ltd. Partnership v. Pima County 240 P.3d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Dos Picos Land Ltd. Partnership v. Pima County 240 P.3d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Ass’n, , (fact-finding within purview of trial court).
Heatec, Inc. v. R.W. Beckett Corp. 197 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Heatec, Inc. v. R.W. Beckett Corp. 197 P.3d 754 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Ass’n v. Bach, ¶ 7 , (“By enacting [§ 12-332], the legislature clearly defined which categories of litigation expenses a prevailing party can recover.
Parker v. McNeill 154 P.3d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Parker v. McNeill 154 P.3d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Ass'n, ¶ 6 , (unrecoverable litigation expenses include expenses incurred for photocopying, long-distance telephone calls, messenger and delivery charges, and telecopier or fax charges).
Foster v. Weir Orthodontic Centers of Arizona, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Foster v. Weir Orthodontic Centers of Arizona, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Ass’n, 973 P.2d at 106, 107-08 (1999) (noting “consistent 4 refusal” of courts to interpret cost statute broadly).
Marriage of Fuentes v. Fuentes 97 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Marriage of Fuentes v. Fuentes 97 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Ass’n v. Bach, -89 , -27 (App.1997) (submitting written closing argument memoranda in *58 lieu of oral argument in light of time constraints), vacated in part on other grounds
Moedt v. General Motors Corp. 60 P.3d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Moedt v. General Motors Corp. 60 P.3d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Ass’n, , 403 ¶ 8, (court should consider whether fees “ ‘bear a direct rela *106 tion to ...
Schritter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 36 P.3d 739 Ariz. 2001
Schritter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 36 P.3d 739 Ariz. 2001
Ass’n, , 402 ¶ 6, , 107 ¶6 (1999).