Cited by

Co., -51 ¶¶ 14-15 (1998).

Co., ¶ 11 (1998) (“[E]ven if defective, a notice of appeal is sufficient if it is neither misleading nor prejudicial.”); (“[W]hen adequate notice to appeal has been given to the other party, no mere technical error should prevent the appellate court from reaching the merits of the

of Pardons and Paroles, (considering whether superior court could exercise special action jurisdiction over constitutional claim after plaintiff mistakenly alleged jurisdiction under the Act); –50, ¶¶ 6, 9 (1998) (considering whether court of appeals had to dismiss appeal from final judgment where notice of appeal was filed by corporation rather than counsel); McKillip v. Smitty’s Super Valu, Inc. (considering effect of notice of appeal that referenced unappealable order rath

Co., ¶ 7 (1998) (“While a natural person can always appear pro per, a corporation is an entity unto itself quite separate from its owners and officers.

eadline of August 24 to finally secure substitute counsel was either unreasonable or an abuse of discretion.3 3 Millennium cites to multiple cases in which courts granted more time than eight days for corporate parties to retain new counsel; however, Millennium wholly mischaracterizes the sole Arizona case to which it cites in support of this contention— ¶ 14 (1998)—which holds only that the court “should give the corporation a reasonable opportunity to cure the defect before dismissing the appe

Co., ¶ 12 (1998) (citation omitted), appearing though counsel after the final judgment has been entered is insufficient to cure a defective appearance, ¶ 12 (App. 2010) (citation omitted).

Co., ¶ 12 , (stating "a corporation cannot appear without a lawyer”).

Co., ¶ 12, -10, -99 (1967).

Co., ¶ 12 , (a corporation may cure its defective appearance after being given a reasonable opportunity by the court to do so).

Co., ¶9 , ("We have cautioned against the use of the word 'jurisdiction' beyond its core meaning.”); , (stating use of word "jurisdiction” to mean subject-matter jurisdiction distinct from use of word to mean authority of cour