Cited by

“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.’” ¶ 7 (App. 2015) ( ¶ 5 (1999)).

An abuse of discretion occurs “when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision.” ¶ 5 (1999) (citation omitted).

¶ 5 (1999) (“The decision to modify an award of child support rests within the sound discretion of the trial court.”).

¶ 5 (1999); ¶ 8 (App. 2018).

An abuse of discretion occurs when the court commits an error of law that underlies its exercise of discretion, ¶ 8 (App. 2018), or “when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 5 (1999) (quotation omitted).

This court accepts the family court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, ¶ 5 (1999) () (affirm unless “devoid of evidentiary support”), but reviews de novo the court’s conclusions of law and interpretation of the Arizona Child Support Guidelines (“Guidelines”), ¶ 7 (App. 2017).

Adoption of B- 6355 & H-533, ¶ 5 (1999).

¶ 5 (1999) (citation omitted); ¶ 11 (App. 2013) (citation omitted).

“The decision to modify an award of child support rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and, absent an abuse of that discretion, will not be disturbed on appeal.” ¶ 5 (1999).

¶ 5 (1999); ¶ 8 (App. 2018).

community property distribution absent an abuse of that court’s broad discretion to apportion the community property.” Saba v. Khoury, ___ Ariz. ___, ___, ¶ 5, ¶ 23 (App. 2004) (“An abuse of discretion exists when the trial court commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.”); ¶ 5 (1999) (citation omitted) (“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support

An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to affirming the orders “is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision.” ¶ 5 (1999) ().

This court reviews the superior court’s legal decision-making and parenting time orders for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 13 (App. 2014), which occurs when the record, “viewed in the light most favorable” to affirming the orders, “is devoid of competent evidence to support the[m].” ¶ 5 (1999) ().

The attribution of income is a fact-intensive inquiry that requires a court to consider “all the circumstances” to determine the outcome that would be in “the best interests of the child[ren].” ¶ 14 (1999) (quotations omitted); see also Sherman, 241 Ariz. at 113 ¶ 12 (upholding an attribution of income to an involuntarily unemployed parent); see generally Guidelines § 5(E).