Cited by

An abuse of discretion occurs when there is no competent evidence to 2 MURRAY v. MURRAY Decision of the Court support the court’s decision, ¶ 5 (1999), or when the court makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision, ¶ 8 (App. 2012).

¶21 “The decision to modify an award of child support rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and, absent an abuse of that discretion, will not be disturbed on appeal.” ¶ 7 (App. 2017) ( ¶ 5 (1999)).

–23 ¶ 13 (1999) (juvenile court must consider a range of factors in determining whether a decision to leave employment is reasonable, and therefore, constitutes underemployment).

“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.’” ¶ 7 (App. 2015) ( ¶ 5 (1999)).

An abuse of discretion occurs “when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision.” ¶ 5 (1999) (citation omitted).

¶ 5 (1999) (“The decision to modify an award of child support rests within the sound discretion of the trial court.”).

¶ 5 (1999); ¶ 8 (App. 2018).

An abuse of discretion occurs when the court commits an error of law that underlies its exercise of discretion, ¶ 8 (App. 2018), or “when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 5 (1999) (quotation omitted).

This court accepts the family court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, ¶ 5 (1999) () (affirm unless “devoid of evidentiary support”), but reviews de novo the court’s conclusions of law and interpretation of the Arizona Child Support Guidelines (“Guidelines”), ¶ 7 (App. 2017).

Adoption of B- 6355 & H-533, ¶ 5 (1999).

¶ 5 (1999) (citation omitted); ¶ 11 (App. 2013) (citation omitted).

“The decision to modify an award of child support rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and, absent an abuse of that discretion, will not be disturbed on appeal.” ¶ 5 (1999).

¶ 5 (1999); ¶ 8 (App. 2018).

community property distribution absent an abuse of that court’s broad discretion to apportion the community property.” Saba v. Khoury, ___ Ariz. ___, ___, ¶ 5, ¶ 23 (App. 2004) (“An abuse of discretion exists when the trial court commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion.”); ¶ 5 (1999) (citation omitted) (“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support

An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to affirming the orders “is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision.” ¶ 5 (1999) ().