Cited by

This court reviews the superior court’s legal decision-making and parenting time orders for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 13 (App. 2014), which occurs when the record, “viewed in the light most favorable” to affirming the orders, “is devoid of competent evidence to support the[m].” ¶ 5 (1999) ().

The attribution of income is a fact-intensive inquiry that requires a court to consider “all the circumstances” to determine the outcome that would be in “the best interests of the child[ren].” ¶ 14 (1999) (quotations omitted); see also Sherman, 241 Ariz. at 113 ¶ 12 (upholding an attribution of income to an involuntarily unemployed parent); see generally Guidelines § 5(E).

¶ 5 (1999); ¶ 2 (App. 2005).

“The decision to modify an award of child support rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and, absent an abuse of that discretion, will not be disturbed on appeal.” ¶ 5 (1999).

[and a] parent has a legal duty to support his or her biological and adopted children.” ¶ 6 (1999); see A.R.S.

3 ¶ 11 (App. 2013); ¶ 5 (1999).

Id.; –23, ¶¶ 13–15 (1999).

an abuse of discretion, ¶ 5 (App. 2019), which “occurs when the court commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision,” ¶ 9 (App. 2019), or when “the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision,” ¶ 5 (1999) ().

¶ 5 (1999); ¶ 8 (App. 2018).

The court abuses its discretion when the record, “viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support[] the decision.” ¶ 13 (App. 2011) ( ¶ 5 (1999)).

“[A]n award of child support rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and, absent an abuse of that discretion, will not be disturbed on appeal.” ¶ 5 (1999).

¶ 26 (App. 2009); ¶ 6 (1999).

§ 25-320 Appendix (“Guidelines”), allows the court to attribute income up to earning capacity when a parent is unemployed or working below his or her full earning capacity “if the parent’s earnings are reduced voluntarily and not for reasonable cause.” ¶ 6 (1999).

An abuse of discretion occurs when the court commits legal error, ¶ 7 (App. 2012), or "when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court's decision, is 'devoid of competent evidence to support' the decision," ¶ 5 (1999) ().

§ 25-327(A) (2019)1; -21, ¶ 6 (1999).