Cited by

¶ 5 (1999); ¶ 2 (App. 2005).

“The decision to modify an award of child support rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and, absent an abuse of that discretion, will not be disturbed on appeal.” ¶ 5 (1999).

[and a] parent has a legal duty to support his or her biological and adopted children.” ¶ 6 (1999); see A.R.S.

3 ¶ 11 (App. 2013); ¶ 5 (1999).

Id.; –23, ¶¶ 13–15 (1999).

an abuse of discretion, ¶ 5 (App. 2019), which “occurs when the court commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision,” ¶ 9 (App. 2019), or when “the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision,” ¶ 5 (1999) ().

¶ 5 (1999); ¶ 8 (App. 2018).

The court abuses its discretion when the record, “viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support[] the decision.” ¶ 13 (App. 2011) ( ¶ 5 (1999)).

“[A]n award of child support rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and, absent an abuse of that discretion, will not be disturbed on appeal.” ¶ 5 (1999).

¶ 26 (App. 2009); ¶ 6 (1999).

§ 25-320 Appendix (“Guidelines”), allows the court to attribute income up to earning capacity when a parent is unemployed or working below his or her full earning capacity “if the parent’s earnings are reduced voluntarily and not for reasonable cause.” ¶ 6 (1999).

An abuse of discretion occurs when the court commits legal error, ¶ 7 (App. 2012), or "when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court's decision, is 'devoid of competent evidence to support' the decision," ¶ 5 (1999) ().

§ 25-327(A) (2019)1; -21, ¶ 6 (1999).

§ 25-403, -22, ¶ 12 (App. 2003) (holding court abused its discretion by modifying custody without making findings on the record); 2) lacks competent evidence supporting its decision, ¶ 5 (1999); or 3) “commits an error of law in the process of exercising its discretion,” ¶ 2 (App. 2005).

¶ 5 (1999); ¶ 8 (App. 2018).

¶ 6 (1999) (“[A] court should modify a child support order only if a parent shows a substantial, continuing change of circumstances.”); ¶ 15 (App. 2017) (explaining that the superior court lacks authority to modify a spousal maintenance order unless a substantial and c

An abuse of discretion occurs when the court commits legal error, ¶ 7 (App. 2012), or "when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court's decision, is 'devoid of competent evidence to support' the decision," ¶ 5 (1999) ().