Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 995 P.2d 682.

1269 citing documents.

LINDA v. v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC. 117 P.3d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Sec., ¶ 11 , Matter of Juv.
Steven K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 113 P.3d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Steven K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 113 P.3d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Kent K. v. Bobby M. 110 P.3d 1013 Ariz. 2005
Kent K. v. Bobby M. 110 P.3d 1013 Ariz. 2005
P.2d 682 (2000), we stated that “[t]o justify termination of the parent-child relationship, the trial court must find, by clear and convincing evidence, at least one of the statutory grounds set out in section 8-533, and also that termination is in the best interest of the child.” Id.
James H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 106 P.3d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
James H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 106 P.3d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Thus, , is implicated by our decision and do not address our concurring colleague’s concerns.
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Oscar O. 100 P.3d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Oscar O. 100 P.3d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Ct., 17B A.R.S.; Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 196 Ariz. 246, and the party seeking termination bears the burden of persuasion, In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-6831, P.2d 785 (App. 1988).
Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 83 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 83 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Sec., , In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8490
Michael M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 42 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Michael M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 42 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Minh T. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 41 P.3d 614 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Minh T. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 41 P.3d 614 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
In Re the Marriage of Dorman 9 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In Re the Marriage of Dorman 9 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Sec., , (court will accept trial court’s best interest finding when not challenged on appeal).