Cited by

Sec., ¶ 22 (2000) (quotation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 12 (2000); ¶ 41 (2005).

Sec., ¶ 20 (2000); In re B.W., 153 Ariz. Cases Dig.

Sec., -50 (2000), and concluded that Father’s length of incarceration will deprive J.V.

Sec., –49, ¶¶ 11–12 (2000).

Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and, by a preponderance of the evidence, that termination is in the child’s best interests, ¶ 22 (2005).

Sec., ¶ 27 (2000) (where there are multiple statutory grounds for termination, if the court affirms on any ground, then it need not consider others).

In assessing deprivation of a normal home, the court must consider all relevant circumstances, –52, ¶ 29 (2000) (requiring the superior court to “consider all relevant factors, including, but not limited to: (1) the length and strength of any parent-child relationship existing when incarceration begins, (2) the degree to which the parent-child relationship can be continued and nurtured during the incarcerat

Sec., –49, ¶¶ 11–12 (2000).

Sec., –49, ¶¶ 11–12 (2000).

Sec., ¶ 22 (2000) (a parent “must act persistently” to establish and maintain a relationship with his child and “must vigorously assert his legal rights to the extent necessary”).