Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona, 11 P.3d 1006.

74 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Marcos Isaac Danner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
State of Arizona v. Marcos Isaac Danner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Veach v. Chandler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Veach v. Chandler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Joel Carson v. Hon. gentry/state Ariz. 2025
Joel Carson v. Hon. gentry/state Ariz. 2025
Comm’n of Ariz., ¶ 11 (2000), as corrected on denial of reconsideration (Nov.
Vande Krol v. superstition/benchmark Ariz. 2025
Vande Krol v. superstition/benchmark Ariz. 2025
Comm’n, ¶ 10 (2000) (“Statutes must contain an express statement of retroactive intent before retroactive application may occur.”); ¶ 14 (1999) (“It is true .
Michael K. Reilly and Sierra Pipeline, LLC v. Philip L. Canale and Terra Canale 565 P.3d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Michael K. Reilly and Sierra Pipeline, LLC v. Philip L. Canale and Terra Canale 565 P.3d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
State of Arizona v. Manuel David Perez-Gutierrez 548 P.3d 1102 Ariz. 2024
State of Arizona v. Manuel David Perez-Gutierrez 548 P.3d 1102 Ariz. 2024
Vande Krol v. superstition/benchmark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Vande Krol v. superstition/benchmark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ute Mountain v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ute Mountain v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Solar v. Ador 435 P.3d 1052 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Solar v. Ador 435 P.3d 1052 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Comm’n of Ariz., ¶ 10 (2000) (“Statutes must contain an express statement of retroactive intent before retroactive application 8 SIETE SOLAR, et al. v. ADOR, et al. Opinion of the Court may occur.”); see also 2003 Ariz. Sess.
State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
Comm’n of Ariz., ¶ 11 (2000) (“Enactments that are procedural only, and do not alter or affect earlier established substantive rights may be applied retroactively.”).
State v. Nixon 394 P.3d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Nixon 394 P.3d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Hall v. Elected Officials' Retirement Plan 383 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2016
Hall v. Elected Officials' Retirement Plan 383 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2016
Comm’n of Ariz., , 471 ¶ 18, (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
siete/mesquite v. ador/mar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
siete/mesquite v. ador/mar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Comm’n of Ariz., ¶ 10 (2000); see also Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 25.
Sandra Howell v. John Howell 361 P.3d 936 Ariz. 2015
Sandra Howell v. John Howell 361 P.3d 936 Ariz. 2015
Newman v. Select Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Newman v. Select Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Comm’n, ¶ 11 (2000) (“Enactments that are procedural only, and do not alter or affect earlier established substantive rights may be applied retroactively.”).
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C. 281 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C. 281 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
State v. Carver 258 P.3d 256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Carver 258 P.3d 256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Comm’n of Ariz., ¶ 11 , (stating “litigants have no vested right in a given mode of procedure”)).
STATE COMPENSATION FUND OF ARIZONA v. Fink 233 P.3d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
STATE COMPENSATION FUND OF ARIZONA v. Fink 233 P.3d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Comm’n, ¶ 24 , Tower Plaza Invs.
State of Arizona v. Alvin Edward Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Alvin Edward Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Comm’n, see also City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., -67 (2005); Aguilar, ¶¶ 25-27, 178 P.3d at 504.
Lorenzo Sanchez, Sr. v. Old Pueblo Anesthesia, Pc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Lorenzo Sanchez, Sr. v. Old Pueblo Anesthesia, Pc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
DeVries v. State 198 P.3d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
DeVries v. State 198 P.3d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Comm’n, , quoting Tower Plaza Inus.
State v. Aguilar 178 P.3d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State v. Aguilar 178 P.3d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Comm’n, , quoting Tower Plaza Invs.
State v. Gum 153 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Gum 153 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Comm’n, ¶ 24 , ); accord State v. Pil-latos, 159 Wash.2d 459, ¶ 19 , -36 (2007) (“A statute does not operate ‘retrospectively1 merely because it is applied in a case arising from conduct antedating the statute’s enactment or upsets expectations based in prior law.”).
Garcia v. Browning 151 P.3d 533 Ariz. 2007
Garcia v. Browning 151 P.3d 533 Ariz. 2007