Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Tourette v. Tourette, 137 P. 426.

103 citing documents.

In Re the Estate of Fred N. Kirkes 295 P.3d 432 Ariz. 2013
In Re the Estate of Fred N. Kirkes 295 P.3d 432 Ariz. 2013
¶9 Gail counters that we have applied an item theory in two other cases, P. 426 (1914), disapproved of by Mortensen v. Knight, 81 Ariz. 325, 331, and In re Monaghan’s Estate, 65 Ariz. 9
In Re the Estate of Fred N. Kirkes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
In Re the Estate of Fred N. Kirkes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
¶11 Gail, however, P. 426 (1914)
Amator v. Amator 560 P.2d 410 Ariz. 1977
Amator v. Amator 560 P.2d 410 Ariz. 1977
Hatch v. Hatch 547 P.2d 1044 Ariz. 1976
Hatch v. Hatch 547 P.2d 1044 Ariz. 1976
Cerny v. First National Bank 467 P.2d 770 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Cerny v. First National Bank 467 P.2d 770 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Isaak v. Superior •Court, , In re Estate of Harber, supra; Newhall •v. McGill, , ; Estate of Miller, , ; Estate of Tyrrell, , 153 P. 767 (1915); , 137 P. 426 (1914).
Rodieck v. Rodieck 450 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Rodieck v. Rodieck 450 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
All that either the husband or wife or both may acquire during the existence of the marriage, otherwise than is specifically excepted, is an acquest of the community.” (Emphasis added) -206 , 137 P. 426, 428 (1914).
Gaethje v. Gaethje 441 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Gaethje v. Gaethje 441 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
298 P. 929 (1931); , 204 P. 1020 (1922); , 137 P. 426 (1914).
King v. Uhlmann 437 P.2d 928 Ariz. 1968
King v. Uhlmann 437 P.2d 928 Ariz. 1968
Section 63-303, A.C.A.1939; , 137 P. 426 , Ann. Cas.1915B, 70; , ; Vol.
Nace v. Nace 432 P.2d 896 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Nace v. Nace 432 P.2d 896 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Porter v. Porter 416 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1966
In Re Foreman's Estate 407 P.2d 102 Ariz. 1965
First National Bank v. Thomason 407 P.2d 102 Ariz. 1965
In Re Foreman's Estate 407 P.2d 102 Ariz. 1965
When either spouse dies the title to the survivor's interest in community real property vests immediately, , 137 P. 426 ; , 168 P. 503 , and similarly the real property of a deceased *150 person changes in ownership upon his death by operation of law and becomes vested in his heirs.
First National Bank v. Thomason 407 P.2d 102 Ariz. 1965
“Fair compensation should be allowed officers in the administration of an estate for services actually performed, but it is also the duty of the court to safeguard the property of the estate, and not countenance claims in the absence of reasonable, justification.” When either spouse dies the title to the survivor’s interest in community real property vests immediately, , 137 P. 426 ; , 168 P. 503 , and similarly the real property of a de *150 ceased person changes in ownership upon his death by
Mortensen v. Knight 305 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1956
Mortensen v. Knight 305 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1956
Morgan v. Bruce 259 P.2d 558 Ariz. 1953
Morgan v. Bruce 259 P.2d 558 Ariz. 1953
The husband has exclusive control and is the agent of the community in the management of the community personalty, , ; and independent of the wishes of the wife (in the absence of fraud upon her) he can subject the community property to the payment of community debts.
Cummings v. Weast 231 P.2d 439 Ariz. 1951
Cummings v. Weast 231 P.2d 439 Ariz. 1951
137 P. 426 ; , ; Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 68 Idaho 506 , .
Monaghan v. Kennerdell 227 P.2d 227 Ariz. 1951
Monaghan v. Kennerdell 227 P.2d 227 Ariz. 1951
Maricopa County v. Douglas 208 P.2d 646 Ariz. 1949
Maricopa County v. Douglas 208 P.2d 646 Ariz. 1949
137 P. 426 , Ann.Cas.1915B, 70; In re Monaghan’s Estate, , .
Shaw v. Greer 194 P.2d 430 Ariz. 1948
Shaw v. Greer 194 P.2d 430 Ariz. 1948
137 P. 426 , Ann.Cas.1915B, 70; , .
Shreeve v. Greer 173 P.2d 641 Ariz. 1946
Shreeve v. Greer 173 P.2d 641 Ariz. 1946
Section 63-303, A.C.A.1939; , 137 P. 426 , Ann.Cas.1915B, 70; , ; Vol.
Monaghan v. Kennerdell 173 P.2d 107 Ariz. 1946
In Re Monaghan's Estate 173 P.2d 107 Ariz. 1946
Monaghan v. Kennerdell 173 P.2d 107 Ariz. 1946
137 P. 426 , Ann.Cas.1915B, 70; , 138 P. 17 ; Estate *13 of Wilson, , 168 P. 503 , wherein it was held that in the absence of a showing of debts, there was no right to administer in probate the community interest of the deceased.
In Re Monaghan's Estate 173 P.2d 107 Ariz. 1946
Blaine v. Blaine 159 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1945
Blaine v. Blaine 159 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1945
Tyson v. Tyson 149 P.2d 674 Ariz. 1944
Valley National Bank v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 113 P.2d 359 Ariz. 1941
Valley National Bank v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 113 P.2d 359 Ariz. 1941
Bristol v. Moser 99 P.2d 706 Ariz. 1940
Bristol v. Moser 99 P.2d 706 Ariz. 1940
Fee v. Arizona State Tax Commission 98 P.2d 467 Ariz. 1940
Fee v. Arizona State Tax Commission 98 P.2d 467 Ariz. 1940
The husband, under our law, is the head of the family and its agent in the control and management of the community: , 137 Pac.