Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Tourette v. Tourette, 137 P. 426.

103 citing documents.

Greer v. Goesling 97 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1939
Greer v. Goesling 97 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1939
Estate of Torrey v. Torrey 95 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1939
Estate of Torrey v. Torrey 95 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1939
Lincoln Fire Insurance Co. of New York v. Barnes 88 P.2d 533 Ariz. 1939
Lincoln Fire Insurance Co. of New York v. Barnes 88 P.2d 533 Ariz. 1939
Schwartz v. Durham 80 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1938
Schwartz v. Durham 80 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1938
Donn v. Kunz 79 P.2d 965 Ariz. 1938
Donn v. Kunz 79 P.2d 965 Ariz. 1938
Schwartz v. Schwartz 79 P.2d 501 Ariz. 1938
Schwartz v. Schwartz 79 P.2d 501 Ariz. 1938
Payne v. Todd 43 P.2d 1004 Ariz. 1935
Blackman v. Blackman 43 P.2d 1011 Ariz. 1935
Blackman v. Blackman 43 P.2d 1011 Ariz. 1935
Our courts have had frequent occasion to construe these various statutes, but the first case which discussed the community law of Arizona as a whole, and laid down the fundamental principles which have since been followed, , 137 Pac.
Payne v. Todd 43 P.2d 1004 Ariz. 1935
’ ’ And further, , 137 Pac.
Lovin v. Woodward 40 P.2d 102 Ariz. 1935
Lovin v. Woodward 40 P.2d 102 Ariz. 1935
Lightning Delivery Co. v. Matteson 39 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1935
Lightning Delivery Co. v. Matteson 39 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1935
Oglesby v. Poage 40 P.2d 90 Ariz. 1935
Oglesby v. Poage 40 P.2d 90 Ariz. 1935
Coe v. Winchester 33 P.2d 286 Ariz. 1934
Coe v. Winchester 33 P.2d 286 Ariz. 1934
Nowland v. Vinyard 29 P.2d 139 Ariz. 1934
Nowland v. Vinyard 29 P.2d 139 Ariz. 1934
Selaster v. Simmons 7 P.2d 258 Ariz. 1932
Selaster v. Simmons 7 P.2d 258 Ariz. 1932
Brown v. Brown 300 P. 1007 Ariz. 1931
Brown v. Brown 300 P. 1007 Ariz. 1931
La Tourette v. La Tourette [ , 137 Pac.
Rundle v. Winters 298 P. 929 Ariz. 1931
Rundle v. Winters 298 P. 929 Ariz. 1931
Roberson v. Teel 275 P. 2 Ariz. 1929
Roberson v. Teel 275 P. 2 Ariz. 1929
Forsythe v. Paschal 271 P. 865 Ariz. 1928
Forsythe v. Paschal 271 P. 865 Ariz. 1928
Jones v. Rigdon 257 P. 639 Ariz. 1927
Jones v. Rigdon 257 P. 639 Ariz. 1927
Stanley v. McKenzie 240 P. 1033 Ariz. 1925
Stanley v. McKenzie 240 P. 1033 Ariz. 1925
Following the authorities cited, we hold that the decree of divorce changed the tenancy of the parties from that *292 of equal owners of the community estate ( , Ann. Cas.
Cosper v. the Valley Bank 237 P. 175 Ariz. 1925
Cosper v. the Valley Bank 237 P. 175 Ariz. 1925
Schofield v. Gold 225 P. 71 Ariz. 1924
Schofield v. Gold 225 P. 71 Ariz. 1924
Le Baron v. Le Baron 205 P. 910 Ariz. 1922
Le Baron v. Le Baron 205 P. 910 Ariz. 1922
Following the authorities cited, we hold that the decree of divorce changed the tenancy of the parties from that of equal owners of the community estate ( , Ann. Cas.
Pauley v. Hadlock 188 P. 263 Ariz. 1920
Pauley v. Hadlock 188 P. 263 Ariz. 1920
Germania Fire Insurance v. Bally 173 P. 1052 Ariz. 1918
Germania Fire Insurance v. Bally 173 P. 1052 Ariz. 1918