Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Knauff v. Davidson, 153 P. 767.

29 citing documents.

In Re the Estate of Jamie Leandra Bixby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
In Re the Estate of Jamie Leandra Bixby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
“[T]he right to make a testamentary disposition of property [i]s of statutory creation only, and [i]s available only on strict compliance with the requirements of the statute.” In re Wilkins’ Estate, see also In re Tyrrell’s Estate, (“The omission of any of the requirements of the statute will not be overlooked on the ground that it is beyond question that the paper was executed by the decedent as his will .
In Re Richard L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Richard L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Decision of the Court namely, by writing, printing, lithographing, or other such mode, provided that same is done with the intention of signing.”) (Emphasis added.); see also In re Wilkin’s Estate, (even if testamentary intent is clear, the decedent must authenticate the Document as a testamentary instrument) ( (“The omission of any of the requirements of the statute will not be overlooked on the ground that it is beyond question that the paper was executed by the decedent as his will .
Gonzalez v. Satrustegui 870 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Gonzalez v. Satrustegui 870 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
In re Tyrrell’s Estate, , 153 P. 767, 768 (1915); Estate of Wilkins
Matter of Estate of Muder 751 P.2d 986 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Matter of Estate of Muder 751 P.2d 986 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
has thought it best, and has therefore determined, to run the risk of frustrating the intentions sometimes, in preference to the risk of giving effect to or facilitating the formation of spurious wills....'" -23 , 153 P. 767, 768 (1915).
Lind v. Muder 751 P.2d 986 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Matter of Estate of Johnson 630 P.2d 1039 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Matter of Estate of Johnson 630 P.2d 1039 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
However, as was stated by our Supreme Court in Estate of Tyrrell, , 153 P. 767 (1915): If the statute requires the testator to sign the instrument and he omits to sign it, although he intended to do so, such omission may not be cured by his intention.
In Re Estate of Mulkins 496 P.2d 605 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
In Re Estate of Mulkins 496 P.2d 605 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
See Estate of Tyrrell, , 153 P. 767 (1915); Estate of Biehn
Cerny v. First National Bank 467 P.2d 770 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Cerny v. First National Bank 467 P.2d 770 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Isaak v. Superior •Court, , In re Estate of Harber, supra; Newhall •v. McGill, , ; Estate of Miller, , ; Estate of Tyrrell, , 153 P. 767 (1915); , 137 P. 426 (1914).
McNutt v. Gercke 157 P.2d 347 Ariz. 1945
McNutt v. Gercke 157 P.2d 347 Ariz. 1945
Valley National Bank v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 113 P.2d 359 Ariz. 1941
Valley National Bank v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 113 P.2d 359 Ariz. 1941
694 ; Estate of Tyrrell, Pac.
Estate of Morrison 103 P.2d 669 Ariz. 1940
Estate of Morrison 103 P.2d 669 Ariz. 1940
In the Estate of Tyrrell, , 153 Pac.
Estate of Wilkins v. Lee 94 P.2d 774 Ariz. 1939
Estate of Wilkins v. Lee 94 P.2d 774 Ariz. 1939
When it is wholly written by the testator, the attestation by subscribing witnesses is not necessary.” *222 We have never had before us a case construing a will to which the objections found in this case were raised, but Pac.
Charles H. Cook Bible School v. Collier 18 P.2d 1112 Ariz. 1933
Charles H. Cook Bible School v. Collier 18 P.2d 1112 Ariz. 1933
A holographic will is one “wholly written by the testator.” Section 3637, Rev. Code 1928; Estate of Tyrrell, , 153 Pac.
Estate of Harris 296 P. 267 Ariz. 1931
Winningham v. Needham 296 P. 267 Ariz. 1931
Winningham v. Needham 296 P. 267 Ariz. 1931
Estate of Tyrrell, , 153 Pac.
Estate of Harris 296 P. 267 Ariz. 1931
Estate of Tyrrell , , 153 P. 767 .