Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. Egich, 199 P. 132.

40 citing documents.

Cristobal Cardenas v. Hon. Holmberg State of Arizona 544 P.3d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
Cristobal Cardenas v. Hon. Holmberg State of Arizona 544 P.3d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State v. Greer 948 P.2d 995 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
State v. Greer 948 P.2d 995 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
1058 (1919), , 199 P. 132, 136 (1921); -65 , -98 (App.1983); State v. Taylor, 25 Ariz.App.
Matter of Guardianship/Conservatorship of Denton 945 P.2d 1283 Ariz. 1997
Denton v. Superior Court 945 P.2d 1283 Ariz. 1997
Matter of Guardianship/Conservatorship of Denton 945 P.2d 1283 Ariz. 1997
Damages § 2, at 615 (1966); Arizona Copper Co., -95 , 177 P. 29, 32-33 (1918), overruled in part on other grounds, , 199 P. 132 (1920).
Denton v. Superior Court 945 P.2d 1283 Ariz. 1997
Damages § 2, at 615 (1966); Arizona Copper Co., -95 , 177 P. 29, 32-33 (1918), overruled in part on other grounds, , 199 P. 132 (1920).
Lou Grubb Chevrolet v. INDUS. COM'N 829 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Lou Grubb Chevrolet v. INDUS. COM'N 829 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
199 P. 132 (1920), the supreme court nevertheless interpreted the language of article XVIII, section 7 as limiting the legislature’s power to define the scope of employers’ liability law.
Henderson v. Gardner Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 714 P.2d 1293 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Henderson v. Gardner Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 714 P.2d 1293 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Saide v. Stanton 659 P.2d 35 Ariz. 1983
Saide v. Stanton 659 P.2d 35 Ariz. 1983
-03 , , -62 (1954); , 556—59, 199 P. 132, 136-37 (1920); Valley National Bank v. Haney, 27 Ariz.App.
Griffen v. Stevenson 402 P.2d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Griffen v. Stevenson 402 P.2d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
199 P. 132 (1920) ; , 295 P. 780 , 81 A.L.R.
Feffer v. Bowman 365 P.2d 472 Ariz. 1961
Feffer v. Bowman 365 P.2d 472 Ariz. 1961
To render meaningful the remedial provisions of the Act this court held in Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. Egich, 1920, , 199 P. 132 , 35 that: “The legislative statement [§ 23-802] that in the occupations named the means used and provided for doing the *53 work are dangerous and hazardous, and the risks and hazards therein inherent and unavoidable * * * is not .a declaration that the accident causing the injury or death must have
Hirsh v. Manley 300 P.2d 588 Ariz. 1956
Hirsh v. Manley 300 P.2d 588 Ariz. 1956
Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. Egich, 1920, , 199 P. 132 .
Henderson v. Breesman 269 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1954
Henderson v. Breesman 269 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1954
199 P. 132 ; 25 C.J.S., Damages, § 162b(5), page 829.
Hudson v. Kelly 263 P.2d 362 Ariz. 1953
Hudson v. Kelly 263 P.2d 362 Ariz. 1953
On the subject of limitations Judge Ross, speaking for this court, said: “A limitation on the legislative power may be by direct prohibition or by implication, and when it is by implication its restraints on the Legislature' • are no less binding than when expressly prohibited.” , 199 P. 132, 135 .
Schmerfeld v. Hendry 245 P.2d 420 Ariz. 1952
Schmerfeld v. Hendry 245 P.2d 420 Ariz. 1952
Grasty v. Sabin 259 P. 1049 Ariz. 1927
Grasty v. Sabin 259 P. 1049 Ariz. 1927
“The only risk or hazard the employee assumes is his own negligence.” , 199 Pac.
Tarbell v. Rivera 251 P. 553 Ariz. 1926
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Gutierrez 249 P. 67 Ariz. 1926
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Gutierrez 249 P. 67 Ariz. 1926
Alabam's Freight Co. v. Hunt 242 P. 658 Ariz. 1926
Salt River Valley Water Users' As'n v. Wheeler 236 P. 1108 Ariz. 1925
Salt River Valley Water Users' As'n v. Wheeler 236 P. 1108 Ariz. 1925
The statute reads: “All work in the construction, alteration or repair of pole lines for telegraph, telephone or other purposes.” , 199 Pac.
Phoenix-Tempe Stone Co. v. Jenkins 237 P. 194 Ariz. 1925
Gazette Printing & Publishing Co. v. Suits 233 P. 595 Ariz. 1925
Gazette Printing & Publishing Co. v. Suits 233 P. 595 Ariz. 1925
Gillis v. Graeber 221 P. 235 Ariz. 1923
Calumet & Arizona Mining Co. v. Winters 219 P. 585 Ariz. 1923
Calumet & Arizona Mining Co. v. Winters 219 P. 585 Ariz. 1923
ish the employee a safe place to work, or safe tools and implements with which to work, is not the ground upon which his liability is based, inasmuch as he is liable even though he may furnish the employee a safe place to work and safe tools and implements with which to work, if, notwithstanding, the employee is injured or killed by an accident due to a condition or conditions of the occupation.” , 199 Pac.