Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. Dickson, 195 P. 538.

54 citing documents.

Katz v. Filandro 739 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Katz v. Filandro 739 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
*605 Katz’s , 195 P. 538 (1921), , 89 P. 588 (1907), , 85 P. 401 (1906), is misplaced.
Lueck v. Superior Court in & for the County of Cochise 457 P.2d 348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Lueck v. Superior Court in & for the County of Cochise 457 P.2d 348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Smith v. Goodman 430 P.2d 922 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Smith v. Goodman 430 P.2d 922 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
A statement of the rule that governs the cases where there is a , 195 P. 538, 540 , 44 A.L.R.
Brand v. JH Rose Trucking Company 427 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1967
Brand v. JH Rose Trucking Company 427 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1967
213 P. 1002 ; , 195 P. 538 , 44 A.L.R.
Johnson v. Board of Education 419 P.2d 52 Ariz. 1966
Johnson v. Board of Education 419 P.2d 52 Ariz. 1966
Barker et ux v. General Petroleum Corporation, et al., , ; , ; , ; , 195 P. 538 , 44 A.L.R.
Salinas v. Kahn 407 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Salinas v. Kahn 407 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Reed v. Gavin 369 P.2d 660 Ariz. 1962
Reed v. Gavin 369 P.2d 660 Ariz. 1962
It therefore appears that the evidence adduced by plaintiff at trial was “insufficient to support a verdict * * * [and] so weak that upon a motion for new trial after verdict the court would feel constrained to set it aside * * , 195 P. 538, 540 , 44 A.L.R.
Lindgren v. Voge 109 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1961
City of Phoenix v. Brown 352 P.2d 754 Ariz. 1960
City of Phoenix v. Brown 352 P.2d 754 Ariz. 1960
Co., , ; , 195 P. 538 , 44 A.L.R.
Picow v. Baldwin 272 P.2d 613 Ariz. 1954
Picow v. Baldwin 272 P.2d 613 Ariz. 1954
In Arizona the law is well settled that the court should grant a motion for directed verdict “where the evidence is insufficient to support a verdict, or where it is so weak that upon a motion for a new trial after verdict the court would feel constrained to set it aside * * *.” , 195 P. 538, 540 , 44 A.L.R.
MacKey v. Blakely Oil, Inc. 268 P.2d 674 Ariz. 1954
MacKey v. Blakely Oil, Inc. 268 P.2d 674 Ariz. 1954
Jeune v. Del E. Webb Const. Co. 265 P.2d 1076 Ariz. 1954
Jeune v. Del E. Webb Const. Co. 265 P.2d 1076 Ariz. 1954
* * * ” , 195 P. 538, 540 , 44 A.L.R.
Nichols v. City of Phoenix 202 P.2d 201 Ariz. 1949
Nichols v. City of Phoenix 202 P.2d 201 Ariz. 1949
Morrison v. Acton 198 P.2d 590 Ariz. 1948
Morrison v. Acton 198 P.2d 590 Ariz. 1948
Cope v. Southern Pac. Co. 185 P.2d 772 Ariz. 1947
Cope v. Southern Pac. Co. 185 P.2d 772 Ariz. 1947
In Davis v. Boggs [ , 199 P. 119 ], supra, this court said: “ * * * A verdict will not he directed in a case where the evidence is conflicting or where on all the facts and circumstances proven there is room for fair and sensible men to differ in their conclusions.” , 195 P. 538, 540 , 44 A.L.R.
Western Truck Lines, Ltd. v. Berry 78 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1938
Western Truck Lines, Ltd. v. Berry 78 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1938
Keefe v. Jacobo 54 P.2d 270 Ariz. 1936
Keefe v. Jacobo 54 P.2d 270 Ariz. 1936
Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance v. Garrison 6 P.2d 47 Ariz. 1931
Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance v. Garrison 6 P.2d 47 Ariz. 1931
725 ; , 44 A. L. R. 881, 195 Pac.
Lazear v. Pendergrass 4 P.2d 386 Ariz. 1931
Lazear v. Pendergrass 4 P.2d 386 Ariz. 1931
44 A. L. R. 881, 195 Pac.
J. D. Halstead Lumber Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 298 P. 925 Ariz. 1931
J. D. Halstead Lumber Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 298 P. 925 Ariz. 1931
44 A. L. R. 881, 195 Pac.
Cadle v. Helfrich 286 P. 186 Ariz. 1930
Cadle v. Helfrich 286 P. 186 Ariz. 1930
If, treating all competent testimony as true (as must be done in passing on a motion of this kind, , 44 A. L. R. 881, 195 Pac.
Butler v. Rule 265 P. 757 Ariz. 1928
Butler v. Rule 265 P. 757 Ariz. 1928
179; , 44 A. L. R. 881, 195 Pac.
Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Berry 250 P. 356 Ariz. 1926
Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Berry 250 P. 356 Ariz. 1926
Smith v. Elder 245 P. 274 Ariz. 1926
Smith v. Elder 245 P. 274 Ariz. 1926
44 A. L. R. 881, 195 Pac.
Brandon v. Carr 237 P. 642 Ariz. 1925
Brandon v. Carr 237 P. 642 Ariz. 1925
Hines v. Gale 213 P. 395 Ariz. 1923

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by