Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Taylor v. Frohmiller, 79 P.2d 961.
- Worker Power v. Glendale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Worker Power v. Glendale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Clean Elections Institute, Inc. v. Brewer 99 P.3d 570 Ariz. 2004
- Clean Elections Institute, Inc. v. Brewer 99 P.3d 570 Ariz. 2004
- Lowing v. Allstate Insurance 859 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1993
- Lowing v. Allstate Insurance 859 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1993
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Goodrich 726 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
-
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Goodrich
726 P.2d 215
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
“Any provision having a natural connection with the title of the act is properly embraced in the act.”
- Litchfield Elementary School District No. 79 v. Babbitt 608 P.2d 792 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Litchfield Elementary School District No. 79 v. Babbitt 608 P.2d 792 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- State v. Sutton 565 P.2d 1278 Ariz. 1977
-
State v. Sutton
565 P.2d 1278
Ariz. 1977
While Art. 4, Part 2, § 13, should be interpreted liberally so as to uphold the constitutionality of an act if there is any legal basis for its validity, White v. Kaibab Road Improvement Dist., supra, constitutional provisions will not be interpreted “so foolishly liberalfly] * * * as to render the constitutional provision nugatory.”
- Mardian Construction Co. v. Superior Court 557 P.2d 526 Ariz. 1976
- Mardian Construction Co. v. Superior Court 557 P.2d 526 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Sutton 551 P.2d 583 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Sutton 551 P.2d 583 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- White v. Kaibab Road Improvement District 550 P.2d 80 Ariz. 1976
- White v. Kaibab Road Improvement District 550 P.2d 80 Ariz. 1976
- Industrial Develop. Auth. of Cty. of Pinal v. Nelson 509 P.2d 705 Ariz. 1973
- Industrial Develop. Auth. of Cty. of Pinal v. Nelson 509 P.2d 705 Ariz. 1973
- Town of Scottsdale v. State Ex Rel. Pickrell 399 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
- Town of Scottsdale v. State Ex Rel. Pickrell 399 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
- State v. Harold 246 P.2d 178 Ariz. 1952
-
State v. Harold
246 P.2d 178
Ariz. 1952
and that' a provision in the act which directly or indirectly relates to the subject of the title and having a natural connection therewith is properly included in the body of the act.
- State v. Pelosi 199 P.2d 125 Ariz. 1948
-
State v. Pelosi
199 P.2d 125
Ariz. 1948
158 P. 837, 840 ( , ) the rule was stated in this language: “By confining the legislation to the subject contained in the title, neither the members of the Legislature nor the people can be misled to vote for something not known to them or intended to be voted for.
- Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. Glover 159 P.2d 292 Ariz. 1945
- Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. Glover 159 P.2d 292 Ariz. 1945
- Hudson v. Brooks 158 P.2d 661 Ariz. 1945
-
Hudson v. Brooks
158 P.2d 661
Ariz. 1945
— No act or section thereof shall be revised or amended by mere reference to the title of such act, but the act or section as amended shall be set forth and published at full length.” , 79 Pac.