Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., 138 P. 781.

89 citing documents.

Sun City Home Owners Association v. Acc Ariz. 2021
Sun City Home Owners Association v. Acc Ariz. 2021
Johnson Utilities LLC v. Arizona Corporation Ariz. 2020
Johnson Utilities LLC v. Arizona Corporation Ariz. 2020
Sun City v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sun City v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Light & Power Co., (“While it is not so named, [the Commission] is, in fact, another department of government, with powers and duties as well defined as any branch of the 4 We reject SCHOA’s suggestion that our analysis begins with strict scrutiny review.
Johnson v. Acc 438 P.3d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Johnson v. Acc 438 P.3d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Light & Power Co., 306 (1914) (referring to the Commission as a fourth branch of state government).
MacGruder v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
MacGruder v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Residential Utility Consumer Office v. Arizona Corporation commission/arizona Water Company 377 P.3d 305 Ariz. 2016
Residential Utility Consumer Office v. Arizona Corporation commission/arizona Water Company 377 P.3d 305 Ariz. 2016
See Ariz. Const. art. 15, § 3; see also State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., 138 P. 781, 786 (1914).
US Airways, Inc. v. Qwest Corp. 361 P.3d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
US Airways, Inc. v. Qwest Corp. 361 P.3d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Light & Power Co., P. 781 (1914); see also Ariz. Corp. Comm’n v. State ex rel.
Ruco v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Residential Utility Consumer Office v. Arizona Corp. Commission 355 P.3d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Residential Utility Consumer Office v. Arizona Corp. Commission 355 P.3d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
to the Constitution ____The “fair value of the property” of public service corporations is the recognized basis upon which rates and charges for services rendered should be made, and it is made the duty of the Commission to ascertain such value, not for legislative use, but for its own use, in arriving at just and reasonable rates and charges____ State v. Tucson Gas, Elec., Light & Power Co., , 138 P. 781, 784-85 (1914); see also Simms v. Round Valley Light & Power Co., , (“It is clear .
Ruco v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Tucson Gas, Elec., Light & Power Co., 138 P. 781, 784-85 (1914); see also Simms v. Round Valley Light & Power Co., (“It is clear .
Sierra Club—Grand Canyon Chapter v. Arizona Corp. Commission 354 P.3d 1127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sierra Club—Grand Canyon Chapter v. Arizona Corp. Commission 354 P.3d 1127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Light & Power Co., see also Ariz. Corp. Comm’n v. State ex rel.
Miller v. Arizona Corp. Commission 251 P.3d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Miller v. Arizona Corp. Commission 251 P.3d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
In State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., , 138 P. 781 (1914), for example, the court labeled the Commission’s powers “extraordinary and unusual,” summarizing them as follows: The Corporation Commission, therefore, has been vested by section 3 ...
Stop Exploiting Taxpayers v. Jones 125 P.3d 396 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Stop Exploiting Taxpayers v. Jones 125 P.3d 396 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Light & Power Co., 138 P. 781, 786 (1914).
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc. 83 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc. 83 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Light & Power Co., -08 , 138 P. 781, 786 (1914) (holding Commission created and given full power to investigate, hear, and determine disputes between utility and general public "primarily for the interest of the consumer").
Qwest Corporation v. Mark McMahon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Qwest Corporation v. Mark McMahon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Light and Power Co., P. 781 (1914).
US West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 34 P.3d 351 Ariz. 2001
US West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 34 P.3d 351 Ariz. 2001
Light & Power Co., 138 P. 781, 785 (1914).
Arizona Consumers Council v. Arizona Corp. Commission 22 P.3d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Arizona Consumers Council v. Arizona Corp. Commission 22 P.3d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Light and Power Co., , 138 P. 781, 785 (1914); U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n, ¶¶ 22-24 , Scates, 118 Ariz. at 534 , 578 P.2d at 615 .
U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 8 P.3d 396 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 8 P.3d 396 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Light & Power Co., , 138 P. 781, 785 (1914).
Consolidated Water Utilities, Ltd. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 875 P.2d 137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Consolidated Water Utilities, Ltd. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 875 P.2d 137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Light and Power Co., , 138 P. 781, 783 (1914); accord Arizona Corp. Comm’n v. State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. Commission 848 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. Commission 848 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. *219 Tucson Gas, Electric Light and Power Co., , 138 P. 781 (1914).
Arizona Corp. Commission v. State Ex Rel. Woods 830 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1992
Arizona Corp. Commission v. State Ex Rel. Woods 830 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1992
Light & Power Co,, , 138 P. 781, 785 (1914).
Southwest Gas Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 818 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Southwest Gas Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 818 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Light & Power Co., , 138 P. 781, 783 (1914).
Arizona Public Service Co. v. City of Phoenix 716 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Arizona Public Service Co. v. City of Phoenix 716 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
art. 15, § 3; State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light and Power Co., , 138 P. 781 (1914).
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. Commission 693 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. Commission 693 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
The Commission’s reliance on State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., , 138 P. 781 (1914) , is also misplaced.
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 645 P.2d 231 Ariz. 1982
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 645 P.2d 231 Ariz. 1982
Simms v. Round Valley Light & Power Co., , , State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light and Power Company, , 138 P. 781 (1914).
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 645 P.2d 243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 645 P.2d 243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Arizona Constitution, art. XV, § 3; , Simms v. Round Valley Light & Power Company, , , State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light and Power Company, , 138 P. 781 (1914).