Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Matter of Ackel, 745 P.2d 92.
- In Re Abrams 257 P.3d 167 Ariz. 2011
-
In Re Abrams
257 P.3d 167
Ariz. 2011
See Fleischman, 188 Ariz. at 113, 933 P.2d at 570; Jett, 180 Ariz. at 111, 882 P.2d at 422; -18, -53 (1989); In re Ackel, 17 overruled in part by Jett, 180 Ariz. at 109, 882 P.2d at 420; In re Morales, Ariz. Comm’n on Jud.
- Clark v. Campbell 193 P.3d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
-
Clark v. Campbell
193 P.3d 320
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In support of her claim that elected officials are entitled to due process in disciplinary proceedings, Clark relies on , overruled in part by
- In Re Carpenter 17 P.3d 91 Ariz. 2001
-
In Re Carpenter
17 P.3d 91
Ariz. 2001
iend and step-grandson); , (removing justice of the peace who failed to recuse himself and engaged in ex parte communications); , (suspending justice of the peace for, among other things, ex parte communications, inappropriate handling of traffic tickets, and allowing staff to accept gifts); , (censuring justice of the peace for making inappropriately sexual comments to litigants and staff); , (censuring justice of the peace who did favors for friends; put other judges on notice of possibility o
- In Re Flournoy 990 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1999
-
In Re Flournoy
990 P.2d 642
Ariz. 1999
In Matter of Ackel, we concluded that “a combination of investigative and judicial functions within an agency does not violate due process.” , overruled on other grounds by
- Comeau v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners 993 P.2d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- Comeau v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners 993 P.2d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- In Re Garcia 884 P.2d 180 Ariz. 1994
- In Re Garcia 884 P.2d 180 Ariz. 1994
- In Re Matter of Braun 883 P.2d 996 Ariz. 1994
-
In Re Matter of Braun
883 P.2d 996
Ariz. 1994
Haddad, 128 Ariz. at 491 , 627 P.2d at 222 .
- In Re Jett 882 P.2d 414 Ariz. 1994
- In Re Jett 882 P.2d 414 Ariz. 1994
- Matter of Peck 867 P.2d 853 Ariz. 1994
-
Matter of Peck
867 P.2d 853
Ariz. 1994
Haddad, 128 Ariz. at 491 , 627 P.2d at 222 .
- Berenter v. Gallinger 839 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
Berenter v. Gallinger
839 P.2d 1120
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
1456 , 43 L.Ed.2d 712 (1975); -39 , -97 (1987)
- In re Garnice 833 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1992
-
In re Garnice
833 P.2d 700
Ariz. 1992
addressed non-attendance at hearings, when a justice of the peace argued that the Commission on Judicial Qualifications improperly permitted Commission members who had not attended all of the hearings to vote.
- Sigmen v. Arizona Department of Real Estate 819 P.2d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- Sigmen v. Arizona Department of Real Estate 819 P.2d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- Elia v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners 812 P.2d 1039 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
Elia v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners
812 P.2d 1039
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
1222, 1225-26 , 20 L.Ed.2d 117 (1968)
- Matter of Marquardt 778 P.2d 241 Ariz. 1989
- Matter of Marquardt 778 P.2d 241 Ariz. 1989
- Ohlmaier v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 776 P.2d 791 Ariz. 1989
- Ohlmaier v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 776 P.2d 791 Ariz. 1989