Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Matter of Ronwin, 680 P.2d 107.

28 citing documents.

Gillette v. Arzola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Gillette v. Arzola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
201(b); n.4 (1983) (“We take notice that the cases exist, that allegations are made, etc. We cannot and do not take notice of the truth or falsity of specific allegations except as established by final judgment.”).
Pusd v. Hon. mcclennen/mckee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Pusd v. Hon. mcclennen/mckee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(holding that the fact that all Arizona Supreme Court judges had been sued by the petitioner in connection with his prior denial of admission to practice law did not require recusal in subsequent litigation seeking admission to the Arizona Bar).
In Re Hamm 123 P.3d 652 Ariz. 2005
In Re Hamm 123 P.3d 652 Ariz. 2005
We do not limit our independent review to matters of law; we have “the ultimate responsibility for determination of fact and law.” (making a finding regarding the credibility of testimony, although in agreement with the Committee).
Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court 120 P.3d 1092 Ariz. 2005
Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court 120 P.3d 1092 Ariz. 2005
Marriage of Birt v. Birt 96 P.3d 544 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Marriage of Birt v. Birt 96 P.3d 544 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
580 n. 4, , 111 n. 4(1983).
In Re Peasley 90 P.3d 764 Ariz. 2004
In Re Peasley 90 P.3d 764 Ariz. 2004
See Horwitz, 180 Ariz. at 22 & n.3, 881 P.2d at 354 & n.3 (taking judicial notice of official court record in respondent’s criminal trial); -82, -13 (1983) (taking judicial notice of actions filed by bar candidate in federal court).
MacK v. Cruikshank 2 P.3d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
MacK v. Cruikshank 2 P.3d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Curry 931 P.2d 1133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Curry 931 P.2d 1133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
(recusal not required even where party has filed collateral lawsuit against the judge over a ruling), cert.
In Re the Marriage of Kells 897 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
In Re the Marriage of Kells 897 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Matter of Horwitz 881 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Horwitz 881 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1994
v. Clark, , (permissible to take judicial notice of record in previous case if party was joined in the action); , 580 n. 4, , 111 n. 4 (1983) (court may take judicial notice that bar applicant filed certain actions in federal court).
Arizona Corp. Commission v. State Ex Rel. Woods 830 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1992
Arizona Corp. Commission v. State Ex Rel. Woods 830 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1992
580 n. 4, , 111 n. 4 (1983) (taking notice of various case files, and stating "[w]e take notice that the cases exist, that allegations are made, etc. We cannot and do not take notice of the truth or falsity of specific allegations except as established by final judgment.”), cert.
In re Macartney 786 P.2d 967 Ariz. 1990
In re Macartney 786 P.2d 967 Ariz. 1990
While similar to the right to engage in other occupations, it is subject to regulation to ensure that those who engage in the practice of law have the necessary mental, physical, and moral qualities required.” , , cert.
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health No. MH-959-10-85 716 P.2d 68 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health No. MH-959-10-85 716 P.2d 68 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Matter of Wetzel 691 P.2d 1063 Ariz. 1984
Matter of Wetzel 691 P.2d 1063 Ariz. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by