DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Goats v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc., 481 P.2d 536.

42 citing documents.

  • Kumbera v. Manickam Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Kumbera v. Manickam Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    See Goats v. A. J. Bayless Mkts., Inc., –71 (1971).
  • Luque v. Ocampo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Luque v. Ocampo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    Bayless Mkts, Inc., (noting trial court is in the best position to weigh and assess witness credibility and conflicting evidence) (citations omitted).
  • Martinez v. Estes 557 P.3d 788 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Martinez v. Estes 557 P.3d 788 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    See Goats v. A. J. Bayless Mkts., Inc.
  • In Re Richard L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • In Re Richard L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Antonetti v. Hon. Westerhausen Klinger 523 P.3d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Antonetti v. Hon. Westerhausen Klinger 523 P.3d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Bayless Mkts., Inc., (noting the superior court “is in the best position to judge the credibility of the witnesses, the weight of evidence, and also the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom”).
  • Johnson v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Johnson v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Bayless Mkts., Inc., ( and Cavazos v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford, Inc., ).
  • Ohmstedt v. Ohmstedt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Ohmstedt v. Ohmstedt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Orman v. Bowers Living Trust Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Orman v. Bowers Living Trust Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Bayless Mkts., Inc., (rejecting a claim of error in factual findings “since the evidence on this point was, at best, conflicting and we will not substitute our opinion for that of the trial court”) (citing Rossi, 90 Ariz. at 209).
  • Vega v. Cipres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Vega v. Cipres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Bayless Mkts., Inc., (“The trial court is in the best position to judge the credibility of the witnesses, the weight of evidence, and also the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom.”).
  • Hefner v. Hefner 456 P.3d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Hefner v. Hefner 456 P.3d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Deferring to the fact-finder’s credibility determination, as we must, ¶ 18 (App. 2015) (citing Goats v. A. J. Bayless Mkts., Inc., Husband did not rebut the presumption in favor of community property with clear and convincing evidence.
  • Thornburg v. Thornburg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Thornburg v. Thornburg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    ¶13 “The trial court is in the best position to judge the credibility of witnesses, the weight of evidence, and also the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom.” Goats v. A. J. Bayless Mkts., Inc., ( and Cavazos v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford, Inc., ).
  • Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Brittner v. Bullock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Brittner v. Bullock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Quijada v. Quijada 437 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Quijada v. Quijada 437 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    ¶¶ 17-18 (App. 2015) ( ¶¶ 16, 19 (App. 2009), and Goats v. A. J. Bayless Mkts., Inc., ).
  • Krakana v. Haass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Krakana v. Haass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Solberg v. Solberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Solberg v. Solberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Vincent v. Nelson 357 P.3d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Vincent v. Nelson 357 P.3d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Bayless Mkts., Inc., 171 (App. 1971).
  • Shurts v. Shurts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Shurts v. Shurts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Bayless Mkts., Inc., –71, –41 (1971) (appellate court generally defers to superior court’s findings regarding witness credibility and conflicting evidence).
  • Lynch v. Brakebill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Lynch v. Brakebill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Cardoso v. Soldo 277 P.3d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
  • Cardoso v. Soldo 277 P.3d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
    Bayless Mkts., Inc., 171 , 541 (1971) (superior court is in the best position to judge credibility of witnesses and resolve conflicting evidence, and appellate court generally defers to its findings).
  • State of Arizona v. Hesam Mohajerin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
  • State of Arizona v. Hesam Mohajerin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
    Bayless Markets, Inc., -69, -39 (1971).