Cited by

¶¶ 18-19 (App. 1998) ().

140 Ariz. at 321 , ; see also Thomas v. Thomas , , 390, (evaluating sufficiency of property by comparing monthly expenses against potential for income generation).

We “may infer from any judgment the findings necessary to sustain it if such additional findings do not conflict with express findings and are reasonably supported by the evidence.” (quotations omitted).

While this court has held that a spouse should not be compelled to withdraw money in a retirement account to supplement the spouse’s income, Gutierrez, 193 Ariz. at 348, ¶ 20, Wife is not being asked to systematically deplete a particular retirement account until nothing remains, (A spouse “should not be expected to live off both the principal, and interest, exhausting whatever financial reserves she possesses to the extent that when she no longer had any earning capacity there would be nothing

Cf. Thomas v. Thomas , , 390, , 109 (App. 1984) (appellate courts may infer from a judgment findings necessary to sustain it if such findings do not conflict with express findings and are reasonably supported by evidence).

–98, ¶ 6 (App. 2005) (); see A.R.S.

(first step of the spousal maintenance analysis is "determin[ing] from the record whether the spouse awarded maintenance meets the statutory requirements" of § 25-319(A)).

As with legal decision-making, a court abuses its discretion in a parenting time order if no reasonable evidence supports that order, see Gutierrez, 193 Ariz. at 348, ¶ 14 (), or by failing to make the requisite findings under A.R.S.

See Gutierrez, 193 Ariz. at 348, ¶ 15 ().

Although the order contained no express findings on the point, this court will “infer from any judgment the findings necessary to sustain it if such additional findings do not conflict with express findings and are reasonably supported by the evidence.”

5 Although the family court did not make separate findings as to each of the three factors, we infer from the decree “the findings necessary to sustain it if such additional findings do not conflict with express findings and are reasonably supported by the evidence.” (citation omitted).

Absent a request for express findings, we may infer additional findings necessary to the judgment as long as they “do not conflict with express findings and are reasonably supported by the evidence.”

Moreover, we “may infer from any judgment the findings necessary to sustain it.” ( ).

“[T]he spouse seeking to overcome the presumption has the burden of establishing a separate character of the property by clear and convincing evidence.”

see Ariz. Rev. Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 25-319(A).