Cited by

Instead, “the receiving spouse’s ability to earn income must be considered in light of some reasonable approximation of the standard of living established during the marriage.”

Where no party timely requests written findings under Rule 82, we presume the court found every fact necessary to support its decision, ¶¶ 7-8 (App. 2024), inferring supportive findings of fact where reasonably supported by the evidence and not in conflict with express findings

(stating that maintenance awards "cannot be based upon mere hopes and speculative expectations").

On review, we “infer from any judgment the findings necessary to sustain it if such additional findings do not conflict with express findings and are reasonably supported by the evidence.” (internal quotation and citation omitted).

¶11 “Property acquired by either spouse during marriage is presumed to be community property, and the spouse seeking to overcome the presumption has the burden of establishing a separate character of the property by clear and convincing evidence.” –98 ¶ 6 (App. 2005) ().

(We infer findings only if they do not conflict with the court’s express findings and if the record supports the inferences.).

–98, ¶ 6 (App. 2005) (); see A.R.S.

¶32 We review an award of spousal maintenance for an abuse of discretion, and will uphold it “if there is any reasonable evidence to support the judgment,”

And a spouse “should not be expected to live off both the principal, and interest, exhausting whatever financial reserves she possesses to the extent that when she no longer had any earning capacity there would be nothing left upon which she could draw.” ().

¶ 2 n.1 (App. 2007); ¶ 8 (App. 2020)

a dissolution action in which wife was awarded spousal maintenance and attorneys’ fees under § 25-324, this court affirmed the trial court’s award of attorneys’ fees finding that husband’s behavior was unreasonable where he concealed marital property and income in an attempt to evade spousal maintena

Elliott, 165 Ariz. at 135

(“An award of spousal maintenance will not be disturbed if there is any reasonable evidence to support the judgment of the [superior] court.”).

ill in fact subsequently be able to support herself in some reasonable approximation of the standard of living established during the marriage.” –24 (App. 1993) (quoting Rainwater, 177 2 TAYLOR v. TAYLOR Decision of the Court Ariz. at 503); (“[W]hile encouraging a [spouse] to seek employment is a worthy purpose, a judgment cannot be based upon mere hopes and speculative expectations.”).

–94 (App. 1995), ¶ 8 (App. 2014); (a party’s concealment of income or assets may be considered when dividing community property).

See Gutierrez, 193 Ariz. at 348, ¶ 15 ().

findings do not conflict with express findings and are reasonably supported by the evidence.” (citation omitted).