Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Thomas v. Thomas, 690 P.2d 105.

131 citing documents.

Ramsay v. WHEELER-RAMSAY 232 P.3d 1249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Property acquired during the marriage is presumed to be community, “and the spouse seeking to overcome the presumption has the burden of establishing a separate character of the property by clear and convincing evidence.” , ( , ).
In Re Marriage of Flower 225 P.3d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Marriage of Flower 225 P.3d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Marriage of Leathers v. Leathers 166 P.3d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Marriage of Leathers v. Leathers 166 P.3d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Marriage of Brebaugh v. Deane 118 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Marriage of Brebaugh v. Deane 118 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
“Property acquired by either spouse during marriage is presumed *98 to be community property, and the spouse seeking to overcome the presumption has the burden of establishing a separate character of the property by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Marriage of Pownall 5 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
In Re Marriage of Pownall 5 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Marriage of Gutierrez v. Gutierrez 972 P.2d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Marriage of Gutierrez v. Gutierrez 972 P.2d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Parmeter 925 P.2d 1369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Parmeter 925 P.2d 1369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
“On appeal, we view all evidence and reasonable conclusions therefrom in the light most favorable to supporting the decision of the trial court regarding the nature of property as community or separate.”
Rainwater v. Rainwater 869 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Rainwater v. Rainwater 869 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
ies that the receiving spouse will in fact subsequently be able to support herself in some reasonable approximation of the standard of living established during the marriage.” , ( , overruled on other grounds in Schroeder)-, , (“the receiving spouse’s ability to earn income must be considered in light of some *504 reasonable approximation of the standard of living established during the marriage”).
Swichtenberg v. Brimer 828 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Swichtenberg v. Brimer 828 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Arizona Laborers, Teamsters and Cement Masons Local 395 Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Hatco, Inc.
Pioneer Federal Savings Bank v. Driver 804 P.2d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Pioneer Federal Savings Bank v. Driver 804 P.2d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Marriage of Elliott v. Elliott 796 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Marriage of Elliott v. Elliott 796 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Bianco v. Patterson 768 P.2d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Bianco v. Patterson 768 P.2d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Rowe v. Rowe 744 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Rowe v. Rowe 744 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
where the court held that it would be unfair to allow the husband to accumulate funds toward his retirement while the wife was forced to pay living expenses from her nest egg.
Ruskin v. Ruskin 738 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Ruskin v. Ruskin 738 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Martin v. Martin 752 P.2d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Martin v. Martin 752 P.2d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Standage v. Standage 711 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Standage v. Standage 711 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
We note that a recent decision of this court, , upheld an award of attorney’s fees where the evidence indicated a distinct lack of cooperation by the spouse against whom the award was made.