Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Samaritan Health Services v. City of Glendale, 714 P.2d 887.

36 citing documents.

WALDEN v. MESA UNIFIED Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
WALDEN v. MESA UNIFIED Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
v. City of Glendale, (stating that a justiciable controversy exists if there is “an assertion of a right, status or legal relation in which the plaintiff has a definite interest and a denial of it by the opposing party”); see also Ariz. Sch.
Jane Doe I; Jane Doe II; And John Doe v. Lenzner Medical Services Llc... ... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Jane Doe I; Jane Doe II; And John Doe v. Lenzner Medical Services Llc... ... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
v. City of Glendale, (collecting statutes regarding physicians’ and others’ duty to report); (addressing scope of marital privilege against testifying in prosecution for child molestation); (noting hospital staff’s reporting of suspe
Flagstaff v. Desert Mountain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Flagstaff v. Desert Mountain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. City of Glendale, (citation omitted)).
Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Secura v. Sudhoff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Secura v. Sudhoff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Chalice Renee Zeitner 436 P.3d 484 Ariz. 2019
State v. Chalice Renee Zeitner 436 P.3d 484 Ariz. 2019
Az Biltmore v. Abr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Az Biltmore v. Abr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Russell Piccoli P.L.C. v. O'Donnell 344 P.3d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Russell Piccoli P.L.C. v. O'Donnell 344 P.3d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
v. City of Glendale, , (citation omitted).
Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of Arizona 311 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of Arizona 311 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Canyon Del Rio Investors, L.L.C. v. City of Flagstaff 258 P.3d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Canyon Del Rio Investors, L.L.C. v. City of Flagstaff 258 P.3d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
v. City of Glendale, , ).
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Hunt v. Richardson 163 P.3d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Hunt v. Richardson 163 P.3d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
McMann v. City of Tucson 47 P.3d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
McMann v. City of Tucson 47 P.3d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Wilson 26 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Wilson 26 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
v. City of Glendale, , (“numerous [statutory] inroads ...
Keggi v. Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance 13 P.3d 785 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Keggi v. Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance 13 P.3d 785 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Under the declaratory judgments act a justiciable controversy exists if there is “an assertion of a right, status, or legal relation in which the plaintiff has a definite interest and a denial of it by the opposing party.” , ( , ).
Linch v. THOMAS-DAVIS MED. CENTERS PC 925 P.2d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Linch v. THOMAS-DAVIS MED. CENTERS PC 925 P.2d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
(hospital has no duty to assert physician-patient privilege "when served with a search warrant relating to its patients' medical records.") , , *548 1354 (App. 1994) (physician-patient privilege does not protect vi
Linch v. Thomas-Davis Medical Centers, P.C. 925 P.2d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Linch v. Thomas-Davis Medical Centers, P.C. 925 P.2d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
(hospital has no duty to assert physician-patient privilege “when served with a search warrant relating to its patients’ medical records.”) , *548 1354 (App.1994) (physician-patient privilege does not protect victi
Benton v. Superior Court, Navajo County 897 P.2d 1352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Benton v. Superior Court, Navajo County 897 P.2d 1352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(discussing exceptions which the legislature has created to the physician-patient privilege).