Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Maldonado, 78 P.3d 1060.

108 citing documents.

State v. English Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Ortiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Curtiss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Curtiss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Whiteside Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Whiteside Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 10 (App. 2003) (“Although [the defendant] stipulated to a lesser number of jurors, the improper denial of a twelve-person jury nonetheless is fundamental error.”).
State v. Lujan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Lujan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Pennington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Pennington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. McLeod Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. McLeod Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Maldonado, 206 Ariz. 339, 341, ¶ 2 n.1 (App. 2003).
State v. Prall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Prall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Maldonado, 206 Ariz. 339, 341, ¶ 2 n.1 (App. 2003).
State v. Merrill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Merrill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Bibbs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Bibbs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ct. 111(i); ¶ 2 n.1 (App. 2003).
State v. Waters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Waters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Eddy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Eddy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ct. 111(i); ¶ 2 n.1 (App. 2003).
State v. Voge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Voge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Roeschen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Roeschen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ct. 111(i); ¶ 2 n.1 (App. 2003).
State v. Ricci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Ricci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ct. 111(i); ¶ 2, n.1 (App. 2003).
Murrell v. Tovar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Murrell v. Tovar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
11, 2021); ¶ 2 n.1 (App. 2003).
State v. Menyongari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Menyongari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
1“Initials are used to protect the victim’s privacy.” ¶ 2 n.1 (App. 2003).
State v. Agyepong Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Agyepong Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ct. 111(i); ¶ 2 n.1 (App. 2003).
State v. Regan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Regan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Reyna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Reyna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
The Merits ¶10 Relying on Article 2, Section 23, Appellant argues that because she faced a prison sentence of thirty or more years throughout her trial, “it was prejudicial error to deprive her of an additional four jurors.” In Maldonado, this court stated, “It is the sentence to which the defendant is exposed at the outset of the jury trial that determ
State v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019