Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Flores, 188 P.3d 706.
- State v. Godoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- State v. Godoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Ortega v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Ortega v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- State v. Collison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Collison
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
–10, ¶ 6 (App. 2008) (entering a guilty plea waives a defendant's challenge to all non-jurisdictional defects, including the deprivation of constitutional rights); see also Ariz. R. Crim.
- State v. Walls-Bey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. Walls-Bey
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-10 ¶ 6 (App. 2008) (“A plea agreement waives all non-jurisdictional defects.”).
- State v. Street Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- State v. Street Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- State v. Norman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
State v. Norman
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
does not require that the victim engage in what the enticer intends”); (recognizing that solicitation “requires no agreement or action by the person solicited” and “is complete when the solicitor, acting with the requisite intent, makes the request”).
- Snook v. Aguilar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Snook v. Aguilar
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(“Title 25 defines the boundaries of a dissolution court’s jurisdiction, and the court may not exceed its jurisdiction even when exercising its equitable powers.”); ¶ 6 (App. 2008); -36, ¶ 7 (App. 2002).
- State v. Calvillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Calvillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Estevez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Estevez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Lay v. Hon. nelson/state 436 P.3d 496 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Lay v. Hon. nelson/state 436 P.3d 496 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State v. Hibbler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Hibbler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Silva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Silva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Wright v. Hon. gates/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Wright v. Hon. gates/state
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
The crime of solicitation is a “crime separate from the crime solicited.” ¶ 7 (App. 2008).
- State v. Perez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Perez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
– 09 (App. 2008); see also Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973) (“A guilty plea represents a break in the chain of events which has preceded it in the criminal process.
- State v. Lanfor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Lanfor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State of Arizona v. Raymond John 308 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Raymond John 308 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State v. Chairez 327 P.3d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-
State v. Chairez
327 P.3d 886
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-09 (App.2008) (guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional defects, including deprivations of constitutional rights).
- Francisco F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 266 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
- Francisco F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 266 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
- State v. Yegan 221 P.3d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-
State v. Yegan
221 P.3d 1027
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
§ 13-108(A)(1) is an “expression of intent to exercise jurisdiction over a crime, wherever committed, when the ‘effect’ or ‘result’ of *216 such crime occurs in Arizona.” 5 ¶ 17
- State v. Silva 216 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- State v. Silva 216 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- State of Arizona v. Javier Fimbres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
-
State of Arizona v. Javier Fimbres
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
-09 (App. 2008).5 Fimbres was indicted for credit card forgery pursuant to § 13- 2104(A)(2), but the trial court instructed the jury sua sponte that it could find Fimbres guilty not only pursuant to § 13-2104(A)(2), as indicted, but also for altering a credit card or manufacturing or utterin
- State of Arizona v. Payne Nelson Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
- State v. Payne 225 P.3d 1131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
- State v. Payne 225 P.3d 1131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
- State of Arizona v. Payne Nelson Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
- State v. Maldonado 219 P.3d 1050 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- State v. Maldonado 219 P.3d 1050 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009