Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Felix, 349 P.3d 1117.

117 citing documents.

State v. Khorrami Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Warren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Warren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Nelson 492 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Nelson 492 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Tejeda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Tejeda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Ricci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Ricci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
To determine whether a prejudicial error occurred, “we may consider the jury instructions as given, the evidence at trial, the parties’ theories, and the parties’ arguments to the jury.” ¶ 16 (App. 2015); see Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 52–53 (1987) (holding the right to confrontation usually is satisfied “if defense counsel receives wide latitude at trial to question witnesses”).
State v. Bueno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Bueno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Freeman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Freeman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Benitez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Benitez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Mowers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Mowers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 5 (App. 2016); ¶ 2 (App. 2015).
State v. Antone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Antone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 32 (App. 2015) (whether a defendant placed the victim in reasonable apprehension of immediate physical injury may be established by circumstantial evidence, without requiring the victim’s testimony).
State v. Twiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Twiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“[I]n some trials, the arguments of counsel can cure or obviate instructional ambiguity or error.” ¶ 18 (App. 2015).
State v. Starnes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Starnes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Mullener Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Mullener Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Zuleger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Zuleger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State V, McDonald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State V, McDonald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Shephard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Shephard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Balli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Balli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 30 (App. 2015) (citation omitted).
State v. Duarte 438 P.3d 707 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Duarte 438 P.3d 707 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. McKinney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. McKinney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 17 (App. 2015); ¶ 9 (2003).
State v. Wooten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Wooten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
s, the superior court specifically instructed, “[the jury] must decide each count separately on the evidence with the law applicable to it, uninfluenced by your decision on any other count.” ¶12 To determine whether error has occurred, “we may consider the jury instructions as given, the evidence at trial, the parties’ theories, and the parties’ arguments to the jury.” ¶ 16 (App. 2015).
State v. Dodd 418 P.3d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Dodd 418 P.3d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Felix , , 289 ¶ 30, , 1126 (App. 2015).
State v. Belvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017