Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Felix, 349 P.3d 1117.

117 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Ricky Alonzo Hippensteel Ariz. 2026
State of Arizona v. Jose Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
State of Arizona v. Jose Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
State v. Stevenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Stevenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Elizondo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Elizondo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶2 This Court “view[s] the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury’s verdict and resolve[s] all reasonable inferences against [Johnson].” ¶ 2 (App. 2015).
State v. Strickland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Strickland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State of Arizona v. Adriel Guevara-Enriquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
State of Arizona v. Adriel Guevara-Enriquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
State v. Alcantar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Alcantar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Aguilar Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Aguilar Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
The victim need not “testify to actual fright or apprehension.” ¶ 32 (App. 2015).
State of Arizona v. Christopher Michael Montoya 554 P.3d 473 Ariz. 2024
State of Arizona v. Christopher Michael Montoya 554 P.3d 473 Ariz. 2024
Closing arguments of counsel may be taken into account when assessing the adequacy of jury instructions.” (internal citation omitted); ¶ 18 (App. 2015) (“[A]lthough ‘arguments of counsel generally carry less weight with a jury than do instructions from the court,’ in some trials, the arguments of counsel can cure or obviate instructional ambiguity or error.” (citations omitted)).
State v. De Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. De Berry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Warner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Warner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State of Arizona v. George Willie Rios 528 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State of Arizona v. George Willie Rios 528 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State v. Gilbert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gilbert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mallotte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mallotte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State of Arizona v. Sergio Fierro Jr 517 P.3d 635 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Sergio Fierro Jr 517 P.3d 635 Ariz. 2022
¶36 The dissent (infra ¶ 45) ¶ 16 (App. 2015), for the proposition that jurors are presumed to follow jury instructions.
State v. Castaneda 517 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Castaneda 517 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Rowan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Rowan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Horak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Horak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Calandra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Calandra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State of Arizona v. James Murray Reaves, III 506 P.3d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
State of Arizona v. James Murray Reaves, III 506 P.3d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
State v. Douglas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Douglas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
To determine whether prejudicial error occurred, “we may consider the jury instructions as given, the evidence at trial, the parties’ theories, and the parties’ arguments to the jury.” ¶ 16 (App. 2015).
State v. Khorrami Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by