Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Felix, 349 P.3d 1117.

117 citing documents.

State v. Belvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, ¶ 30 (App. 2015) ( ¶ 15 (2011)), and will reverse “only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction,” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Vallejos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Vallejos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
to believe that [Defendant] could be found guilty as an accomplice even if his intent was to simply aid his codefendants in causing some physical injury.” for the proposition that accomplice liability requires proof of the defendant’s intent to promote or facilitate the specific offense charged.
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, ¶ 30 (App. 2015) ( ¶ 15 (2011)), and will reverse “only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction,” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Hicks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hicks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Lowe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Garcia-Corrales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Garcia-Corrales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sufficiency of the Evidence ¶11 We review a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, ¶ 30, (citation omitted), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, and reversing only if there is no substantial evidence supporting the conviction, ¶ 4, (citation omitted).
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Puma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Puma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015